Integrating Word Cloud Technology with Active Learning Methods to Enhance Thai Undergraduate Students’ English Grammar Competence
คำสำคัญ:
Grammar Competence, Thai EFL Learners, Word Cloud, Active Learning Methodบทคัดย่อ
In the context of university-level education, the integration of active learning methodologies into grammar instruction has become increasingly indispensable for promoting learner engagement, autonomy, and higher-order thinking skills. In English as a Foreign Language (EFL) settings—particularly in Thailand—grammar remains a persistent pedagogical challenge. This quasi-experimental study investigated the effectiveness of incorporating word cloud technology within active learning frameworks to enhance grammatical competence among 38 second-year English major students at Bansomdejchaopraya Rajabhat University, selected through cluster random sampling.Research instruments included pre- and post-achievement tests, student learning logs, and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, including a paired-samples t-test and relative development scores. Results indicated a statistically significant improvement in students’ grammatical competence (p < .05), with a large effect size. Qualitative data from interviews and learning logs were thematically coded and content-analyzed, yielding three emerging themes: (1) Grammatical Competence, reflecting students’ increased ability to understand parts of speech, sentence structures, subject-verb agreement, and vocabulary expansion through contextualized examples; (2) Learning and Teaching Activities, highlighting the motivational impact of group collaboration, Think-Pair-Share techniques, gamified exercises, and student-centered tasks; and (3) Technology in Enhancing English, emphasizing the role of word cloud tools in promoting engagement, independent learning, and instructional applicability, while also identifying challenges such as device limitations and unstable internet connectivity.Findings from semi-structured interviews further corroborated the quantitative results, revealing that learners perceived the integration of word clouds and active learning as not only effective in reinforcing grammar skills, but also transformative in shaping their future pedagogical beliefs as pre-service teachers. Participants reported greater confidence, deeper vocabulary retention, improved reading comprehension, and increased enthusiasm for collaborative learning. Despite some technological constraints, students overwhelmingly endorsed the approach as a dynamic, visually engaging, and pedagogically sound enhancement to traditional grammar instruction in higher education contexts.
เอกสารอ้างอิง
Al-Mekhlafi, A., & Nagaratnam, R. P. (2011). Difficulties in teaching and learning grammar in an EFL context. International Journal of instruction, 4(2), 69-92.
Al-Shihri, K. A. (2019). The effect of using active learning strategies on secondary EFL learners’ grammar achievement. American Journal of Educational Research, 7(4), 309-313.
Aziz, A. A., & Kashinathan, S. (2021). ESL Learners’ Challenges in Speaking EnglishinMalaysian Classroom. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 10(2), 983–991
Canning-Wilson, C., & Wallace, J. (2000). Practical Aspects of Using Video in the ForeignLanguage Classroom. The Internet TESL Journal, 6, 36.
Eison, J. (2010). Using active learning instructional strategies to create excitement and enhance learning. Jurnal Pendidikantentang Strategi Pembelajaran Aktif (Active Learning) Books, 2(1), 1-10.
Filatova, O. (2016). More than a word cloud. Tesol Journal, 7(2), 438-448.
Fozila, O. (2023). Using Technology in ESL CLASSROOMS: HIGHLIGHTS AND CHALLENGES. Modern Science and Research, 2(10), 31–38.
Frodesen, J (2001). Grammar in Writing. In M. Celce-Murcla. Teaching English as a Second Language. Heinle & Heinle.
Gholami, V., Moghaddam, M. M., & Attaran, A. (2014). Towards an interactive EFL class: Using active learning strategies. The Clarion-International Multidisciplinary Journal, 3(2), 67-74.
Harmer, J. (2001). The Practice of English Language Teaching. (3rd ed.). Longman.
__________. (2004). How to teach writing. Pearson Education.
Huang, Y., Wang, Y., & Ye, F. (2019). A Study of the application of word cloud visualization in college english teaching. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 9(2), 119-122.
Hussain, A. L. (2016) Harnessing the Barriers That Impact on Students' English Language Learning (ELL). International Journal of Instruction, 9(2), 91–106.
Kampookaew, P. (2020). An Analysis of Grammatical Errors Made by Thai EFL University Students in an EAP writing Class: Issues and Recommendations. REFLections, 27(2), 246–
Kolln, M. & Funk, R. (2010). Understanding English Grammar. Pearson Education.
Manda. (2023). An examination of the implementation of active learning strategies that enhance active learning of secondary school English grammar. [Doctoral dissertation, Mzuzu University].
Phillips, J. M. (2005). Strategies for active learning in online continuing education. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 36(2), 77-83
Pradaphon, K.- on and Rungruangthum, M. (2022) “Using Word Clouds for Teaching Sentence Writing in English at Tertiary Level”, Education and Communication Technology Journal, 17(23), 58-71.
Sainte, J., & Ichikawa, K. (2023). An Attempt at Active Learning in English Grammar Classes: A View of Joint Teaching Two Classes. 香川高等専門学校研究紀要= The bulletin of Kagawa National College of Technology, (14), 119-126.
Shaaruddin, J., & Mohamad, M. (2017). Identifying the effectiveness of active learning strategies and benefits in curriculum and pedagogy courses for undergraduate TESL students. Creative Education, 8(14), 2312.
Seemanath, P., & Watanapokakul, S. (2024). Active Learning in English at Work: Assessing Effectiveness and EFL Undergraduate Student Attitudes. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 17(1), 538-571.
Tafazoli, D. (2013). Wordling: Using word clouds in teaching English language. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning. 10, 53-58
Watcharapunyawong, S., & Usaha, S. (2013). Thai EFL Students’ Writing Errors in Different Text Types: The Interference of the First Language. English Language Teaching. 6. 67-78.
Watanapokakul, S. (2024). Enhancing Active Grammar Learning in a Synchronous Online EFL Undergraduate Classroom: Development and Assessment of the LPCR Online Instructional Model. EFLections, 31(3), 990–1022.
Widodo, H. P. (2006). Approaches and procedures for teaching grammar. English teaching: Practice and critique, 5(1), 122-141.
Yamauchi, M. (2020). Active Learning in the Japanese EFL Classroom. The Journal of Chiba University of Commerce, 57(3), 71-94.
Zahra, A. (2015). Current Challenges. (1999) in Teaching/Learning English for EFL Learners:The Case of Junior High School and High School,Procedia - Social and Behavioral, 10(3), 394-401.
ดาวน์โหลด
เผยแพร่แล้ว
รูปแบบการอ้างอิง
ฉบับ
ประเภทบทความ
สัญญาอนุญาต
ลิขสิทธิ์ (c) 2025 คณะมนุษยศาสตร์และสังคมศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏบ้านสมเด็จเจ้าพระยา

อนุญาตภายใต้เงื่อนไข Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
