นวัตกรรมแก้มลิงใต้ดินสำหรับกักเก็บน้ำและป้องกันน้ำท่วม
Main Article Content
บทคัดย่อ
การศึกษานี้เป็นการประเมินประสิทธิภาพของระบบกักเก็บน้ำฝนใต้ดินหลังจากการติดตั้งนวัตกรรมแก้มลิงใต้ดินสำหรับกักเก็บน้ำและป้องกันน้ำท่วม เพื่อในการเสริมสร้างความสามารถในการรับมือน้ำท่วมในเขตดุสิต กรุงเทพมหานครซึ่งเป็นพื้นที่ที่มีความเสี่ยงสูงต่อปัญหาน้ำท่วมจากแม่น้ำและน้ำฝนอันเกิดจากระดับน้ำทะเลที่เพิ่มสูงขึ้น (SLR) การขยายตัวของเมือง และการเปลี่ยนแปลงสภาพภูมิอากาศโดยใช้แบบจำลอง MIKE 11 พร้อมกับเครื่องมือระบบสารสนเทศภูมิศาสตร์ (GIS) สร้างแผนที่แสดงระดับน้ำท่วมที่มีความละเอียดสูง ภายใต้เงื่อนไขของช่วงเวลาการเกิดซ้ำของน้ำท่วม (Return Periods) และสถานการณ์ระดับน้ำทะเลที่เพิ่มสูงขึ้น และทำการคำนวณมูลค่าความเสียหายคาดการณ์รายปีโดยอิงจากการเปลี่ยนแปลงของประเภทอาคารและการใช้ที่ดินที่คาดการณ์ไว้ในปี 2025
Article Details
เอกสารอ้างอิง
Aerts JCJH, Botzen WJW, Emanuel K, Lin N, de Moel H, Michel-Kerjan EO. 2014. Climate adaptation. Evaluating flood resilience strategies for coastal megacities. Science. 344(6183):473–75
Asian Development Bank (ADB), 2022. Urban Climate Change Resilience in Southeast Asia: Flood Risk and Adaptation Strategies.
Badura T, Krkoška Lorencová E, Ferrini S, Vačkářová D. 2021. Public support for urban climate adaptation policy through nature-based solutions in Prague. Landscape and Urban Planning. 215:104215
Bangkok Metropolitan Administration, 2020. Flood Risk Management in Bangkok: An Integrated Approach.
Brown RR, Keath N, Wong THF. 2009. Urban water management in cities: historical, current and future regimes. Water science and technology
Budhathoki A, Tanaka T, Tachikawa Y. 2023. Assessing extreme flood inundation and demographic exposure in climate change using large ensemble climate simulation data in the Lower Chao Phraya River Basin of Thailand. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies. 50:101583
Canton, H. (2021). United Nations Environment Programme—UNEP. In The Europa directory of international organizations 2021 (pp. 188-214). Routledge.
Citaristi I. 2022. Asian Development Bank—ADB. In The Europa Directory of International Organizations 2022, pp. 453–57. London: Routledge
de Moel H, Aerts JCJH. 2011. Effect of uncertainty in land use, damage models and inundation depth on flood damage estimates. Nat. Hazards. 58(1):407–25
de Moel H, Jongman B, Kreibich H, Merz B, Penning-Rowsell E, Ward PJ. 2015. Flood risk assessments at different spatial scales. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change. 20(6):865–90
Debele SE, Leo LS, Kumar P, Sahani J, Ommer J, et al. 2023. Nature-based solutions can help reduce the impact of natural hazards: A global analysis of NBS case studies. Sci. Total Environ. 902:165824
Dutta D, Niu S. 2005. Impacts of Sea level rising on flooding in coastal cities: a case study in Bangkok, Thailand. SEISAN KENKYU
Goeysinsup K. 2022. Impacts of future sea level rise on fluvial and coastal flood risk in Bangkok, Thailand
Grossi P, Kunreuther H, eds. 2005. Catastrophe Modeling: A New Approach to Managing Risk. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers
Haasnoot M, Di Fant V, Kwakkel J, Lawrence J. 2024. Lessons from a decade of adaptive pathways studies for climate adaptation. Global Environmental Change. 88:102907
Hobbie SE, Grimm NB. 2020. Nature-based approaches to managing climate change impacts in cities. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 375(1794):20190124
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge University Press.
Iturbide M, Fernández J, Gutiérrez JM, Pirani A, Huard D, et al. 2022. Implementation of FAIR principles in the IPCC: the WGI AR6 Atlas repository. Sci. Data. 9(1):629
Jha AK, Bloch R, Lamond J. 2012. Cities and flooding: a guide to integrated urban flood risk management for the 21st century
Jones L, Harvey B, Cochrane L, Cantin B, Conway D, et al. 2018. Designing the next generation of climate adaptation research for development. Reg. Environ. Change. 18(1):297–304
Jongman B, Winsemius HC, Fraser SA, Muis S, Ward PJ. 2018. Assessment and Adaptation to Climate Change-Related Flood Risks. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Natural Hazard Science. Oxford University Press
Klijn E-H, Skelcher C. 2007. Democracy and governance networks: compatible or not? Public Adm. 85(3):587–608
Kumar P, Debele SE, Sahani J, Rawat N, Marti-Cardona B, et al. 2021. An overview of monitoring methods for assessing the performance of nature-based solutions against natural hazards. Earth-Science Reviews. 217:103603
Lee H, Calvin K, Dasgupta D, Krinner G, Mukherji A. 2023. IPCC, 2023: Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report, Summary for Policymakers. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the …
MacLean SB, Vytiniotis A, Sykora DW. 2020. Laboratory testing and engineering analysis of an underground stormwater detention system. Geo-Congress 2020, pp. 60–69. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers
Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pirani A, Connors SL. 2021. Climate change 2021: the physical science basis. … sixth assessment report …
Meyer V. 2018. Decision support on flood management in complex urban settings. is risk assessment the right approach or do we need decision heuristics? In Urban Transformations, Vol. 10, eds. S Kabisch, F Koch, E Gawel, A Haase, S Knapp, et al., pp. 363–73. Cham: Springer International Publishing
Nicholls RJ, Cazenave A. 2010. Sea-level rise and its impact on coastal zones. Science. 328(5985):1517–20
Nilubon P, Laeni N. 2024. Re-thinking new possibilities for urban climate resilience planning in Bangkok: Introducing adaptation pathways through a multidisciplinary design workshop. Environmental Science & Policy. 154:103711
Nilubon P, Veerbeek W, Zevenbergen C. 2016. Amphibious architecture and design: A catalyst of opportunistic adaptation? – case study bangkok. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 216:470–80
Nilubon P, Veerbeek W, Zevenbergen C. 2019. Integrating climate adaptation into asset management planning – Assessing the adaptation potential and opportunities of an urban area in Bangkok. International Journal of Water Resources Engineering
Nilubon P. 2021. Opportunistic Adaptation: Using the Urban Renewal Cycle to Adapt to Climate Change. London: CRC Press
Patel A, Keriwala N, Mehta D, Shaikh M, Eslamian S. 2023. Flood resilient plan for urban area: A case study. In Disaster Risk Reduction for Resilience: Climate Change and Disaster Risk Adaptation, eds. S Eslamian, F Eslamian, pp. 161–90. Cham: Springer International Publishing
Patil DD, Wadhai VM, Gokhale JA. 2010. Evaluation of decision tree pruning algorithms for complexity and classification accuracy. IJCA. 11(2):23–30
Peterson LA, Gallagher PM, Spatari S. 2022. Life cycle environmental impact of underground plastic recharge chambers in stormwater management. Buildings. 12(6):867
Pinto LV, Inácio M, Pereira P. 2023. Green and blue infrastructure (GBI) and urban nature-based solutions (NbS) contribution to human and ecological well-being and health. Oxford Open Infrastructure and Health. 1:
Quinlan JR. 1987. Simplifying decision trees. Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 27(3):221–34
Raška P, Bezak N, Ferreira CSS, Kalantari Z, Banasik K, et al. 2022. Identifying barriers for nature-based solutions in flood risk management: An interdisciplinary overview using expert community approach. J. Environ. Manage. 310:114725
Rosenzweig B, Montalto FA, Orton P, Kaatz J, Maher N, et al. 2024. NPCC4: Climate change and New York City’s flood risk. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
Rosenzweig BR, McPhillips L, Chang H, Cheng C, Welty C, et al. 2018. Pluvial flood risk and opportunities for resilience. WIREs Water. 5(6):e1302
Rossi B, Marique A-F, Glaumann M, Reiter S. 2012. Life-cycle assessment of residential buildings in three different European locations, basic tool. Building and Environment. 51:395–401
Schipper ELF. 2007. Climate change adaptation and development: Exploring the linkages. Tyndall centre for climate change research working …
Scolobig A, Linnerooth-Bayer J, Pelling M, Martin JGC, Deubelli TM, et al. 2023. Transformative adaptation through nature-based solutions: a comparative case study analysis in China, Italy, and Germany. Reg. Environ. Change. 23(2):69
Shi L, Chu E, Anguelovski I, Aylett A, Debats J, et al. 2016. Roadmap towards justice in urban climate adaptation research. Nat. Clim. Chang. 6(2):131–37
Singkran N, Kandasamy J. 2016. Developing a strategic flood risk management framework for Bangkok, Thailand. Nat. Hazards. 84(2):933–57
Smith A, Bates PD, Wing O, Sampson C, Quinn N, Neal J. 2019. New estimates of flood exposure in developing countries using high-resolution population data. Nat. Commun. 10(1):1814
United Nations (UN). (2022). World Cities Report 2022. United Nations (UN).
Wang L, Zhao J, Lin Y, Chen G. 2024. Exploring ecological carbon sequestration advantage and economic responses in an ecological security pattern: A nature-based solutions perspective. Ecol. Modell. 488:110597
Ward PJ, Marfai MA, Yulianto F, Hizbaron DR, Aerts JCJH. 2011. Coastal inundation and damage exposure estimation: a case study for Jakarta. Nat. Hazards. 56(3):899–916
Wise RM, Fazey I, Stafford Smith M, Park SE, Eakin HC, et al. 2014. Reconceptualising adaptation to climate change as part of pathways of change and response. Global Environmental Change. 28:325–36
World Bank (2012). Thai flood 2011: Rapid assessment for resilient recovery and reconstruction planning: Overview (English). Washington, DC: World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/677841468335414861/Overview
Zheng HW, Shen GQ, Wang H. 2014. A review of recent studies on sustainable urban renewal. Habitat Int. 41:272–79