A COMPARISON OF LEARNING ACHIEVEMENT IN CHINESE GRAMMAR ON THE TOPIC OF “把” USING PROBLEM-SOLVING SIMULATIONS AMONG SECOND-YEAR STUDENTS IN THE CHINESE LANGUAGE PROGRAM, FACULTY OF EDUCATION

Main Article Content

Nantiwan Inhatkruad
Watsawan Wongkamhang
Peerapat Puangjit

Abstract

This research aimed to compare learning achievement in Chinese grammar on the topic of “把” using problem-solving simulations and to examine the students’ satisfaction with learning through such simulations. The sample group consisted of 25 second-year students in the Chinese Language Program, Faculty of Education, Kamphaeng Phet Rajabhat University, selected through purposive sampling. The research tools included a lesson plan using problem-solving simulations, pre- and post-learning tests, and a satisfaction assessment form. The data were analyzed using percentage, mean , standard deviation , and t-test. The findings revealed that the average scores of learning achievement in Chinese grammar on “把” before and after learning through problem-solving simulations were 19.33 and 26.70, respectively. The students’ learning achievement significantly improved at the .05 level compared to before learning. Furthermore, the study of students’ satisfaction indicated a high level of satisfaction with the learning approach, with a mean score of 4.31. Students also reported being able to apply the acquired knowledge to their teaching practice and during internships, with  an application rate of 100%.

Article Details

How to Cite
Inhatkruad, N., Wongkamhang, W. ., & Puangjit, P. . (2024). A COMPARISON OF LEARNING ACHIEVEMENT IN CHINESE GRAMMAR ON THE TOPIC OF “把” USING PROBLEM-SOLVING SIMULATIONS AMONG SECOND-YEAR STUDENTS IN THE CHINESE LANGUAGE PROGRAM, FACULTY OF EDUCATION. EDUCATION JOURNAL FACULTY OF EDUCATION KAMPHAENGPHET RAJABHAT UNIVERSITY, 8(16), 1–12. retrieved from https://so08.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/EJFE/article/view/3868
Section
Research article

References

ทิศนา แขมมณี. (2550). รูปแบบการเรียนการสอนที่หลากหลาย. กรุงเทพฯ : จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.

Dickins,P.M.R., and Woods,E.G. (1988). Some criteria for the development of communicative grammar tasks. TESOL Quarterly, 22(3), 623-646.

Johnson, Keith and Morrow, Keith. (1981). Communication in the Classroom. London : Longman.

Richards, Jack C. (1985). Longman Dictionary of Applied Linguistics. Harlow, England: Longman.

Su, Y. (2015). International Chinese Teaching Methods and Techniques for Teaching Chinese Grammar. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press.

Wang, X., Zhang, X. (2011). An Analysis on Acquisition Errors of the “Ba” Sentence by Intermediate Thai Students. Journal Of Qinzhou University, 26(4), 42-46.

Wei, H. (2006). The Error Analysis and Teaching Strategy of “Ba” Sentences to Thai Students at the Initial Stage. Journal Of Yunnan Normal University, 4(2), 54-58.

邓涵. (2018). 泰国学生高中生口语课“把”字句教学设计. 北京万方数据股份有限公司万方数据电子出版社.

许美玲. (2012). 初等水平泰国学生“把”字句的教学设计研究. 北京大学出版社.