Developing Age-Friendly Built Environments through Universal Design: A Case Study of Wat Phleng Community, Ratchaburi Province
Main Article Content
Abstract
The demographic transition toward an aging society necessitates the development of built environments that respond to changing needs. This research aimed to: (1) analyze physical factors affecting older adults in the Wat Phleng community, Ratchaburi Province; (2) propose design guidelines and prototypes based on Universal Design (UD) principles; and (3) evaluate user satisfaction. The study employed a case study approach with purposive sampling of 128 participants (116 quantitative and 12 qualitative). Data were collected through field surveys, behavioral mapping, and user walk-through audits.
The findings indicated that existing public spaces and waterfront residential areas have limitations in safety, inadequate facilities, inefficient circulation, and poor accessibility, which do not comply with Universal Design principles. These issues lead to unequal spatial use. In response, a development framework was proposed by integrating the seven UD principles into physical indicators aligned with international standards and ministerial regulations. This framework guided the design of public spaces, floating market areas, and five residential prototypes tailored to local contexts. Design evaluation focused on perceived usability in terms of safety, convenience, and accessibility.
The satisfaction results from 116 participants showed a high overall level ( = 4.21, S.D. = 0.65). Among the dimensions, safety scored the highest ( = 4.24, S.D. = 0.65), followed by development worthiness ( = 4.21, S.D. = 0.68) and compatibility with local architectural context ( = 4.19, S.D. = 0.61).
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 : Faculty of Architecture and Design, Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakhon
References
กฎกระทรวงกำหนดสิ่งอำนวยความสะดวกในอาคารสำหรับผู้พิการหรือทุพพลภาพ และคนชรา พ.ศ. 2548. (2548, 2 กรกฎาคม). ราชกิจจานุเบกษา. เล่ม 122 ตอนที่ 52 ก. หน้า 1–10.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
International Organization for Standardization. (2021). Building construction — Accessibility and usability of the built environment (ISO Standard No. 21542:2021). https://www.iso.org/standard/71860.html
Lawton, M. P. (1998). Environment and aging: Theory and application. In R. J. Scheidt & P. G. Windley (Eds.), Environment and aging theory: A focus on housing (pp. 1–32). Greenwood Press.
Lawton, M. P., & Nahemow, L. (1973). Ecology and the aging process. In C. Eisdorfer & M. P. Lawton (Eds.), The psychology of adult development and aging (pp. 619–674). American Psychological Association.
Mace, R. (1998). A perspective on universal design. https://universaldesignaustralia.net.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Mace-The-Evolution-of-Universal-Design-Word.doc
Pynoos, J., Steinman, B. A., & Nguyen, A. Q. (2010). Environmental assessment and modification as fall-prevention strategies for older adults. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, 26(4), 633–644. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20934614/
Steinfeld, E., & Maisel, J. (2012). Universal design: Creating inclusive environments. John Wiley & Sons.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2010). 2010 ADA standards for accessible design. https://www.ada.gov/law-and-regs/design-standards/2010-stds/
World Health Organization. (2007). Global age-friendly cities: A guide. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241547307
World Health Organization. (2018). The world is ageing: Age-friendly world. https://www.who.int/ageing/en/