Science in Daily Life: Meaningful Learning through Real-World Contexts

Authors

Keywords:

science in daily life, context-based learning, scientific literacy, student competencies

Abstract

This academic article aims to propose an instructional approach that incorporates learners’ everyday life contexts into science learning, in order to foster meaningful understanding and 21st-century core competencies. Grounded in the theoretical frameworks of Constructivism, Context-Based Learning, and Scientific Literacy, this article analyzes the importance of designing science instruction through real-life situations and relevant experiences. Examples of learning activities and classroom-based case studies—such as analyzing drinking water quality or investigating chemical products at home—are provided to demonstrate how everyday contexts can be transformed into powerful learning environments. Furthermore, the article presents five key pedagogical recommendations: using real-world questioning as a starting point, developing contextualized learning materials, supporting systemic collaboration between schools and communities, enhancing teacher professional development in contextual pedagogy, and employing assessment strategies aligned with meaningful learning outcomes. The article ultimately argues that science learning rooted in everyday contexts can empower students to connect classroom knowledge with the real world, cultivating scientifically literate individuals capable of living responsibly and sustainably.

References

Aikenhead, G. S. (2006). Science education for everyday life: Evidence-based practice. Teachers College Press.

Beane, J. A. (1997). Curriculum integration: Designing the core of democratic education. Teachers College Press.

Bennett, J., Lubben, F., & Hogarth, S. (2007). Bringing science to life: A synthesis of the research evidence on the effects of context‐based and STS approaches to science teaching. Science Education, 91(3), 347–370.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31.

Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Heinemann.

Dori, Y. J., & Holenstein, M. (2004). How to learn what you see: Comparing observation skills of higher and lower achievers in a multimedia case-based learning environment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(3), 353–364. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOST.0000045466.92603.95

Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023007005

Gilbert, J. K. (2006). On the nature of “context” in chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 957–976.

Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty‐first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28–54.

Jacobs, H. H. (1989). Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).

OECD. (2018). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science and financial literacy. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en

Piaget, J. (1977). The development of thought: Equilibration of cognitive structures (A. Rosin, Trans.). Viking Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

สำนักงานคณะกรรมการการศึกษาขั้นพื้นฐาน กระทรวงศึกษาธิการ. (2564). โครงการพัฒนาหลักสูตรการศึกษาขั้นพื้นฐาน พุทธศักราช .... (หลักสูตรฐานสมรรถนะ). https://cbethailand.com/

Downloads

Published

2025-06-21

How to Cite

Bunroek, P. (2025). Science in Daily Life: Meaningful Learning through Real-World Contexts. Journal of Interdisciplinary Research and Educational Innovation, 4(1), 1–14. retrieved from https://so08.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JIREI/article/view/5209

Issue

Section

Academic Articles