Research on Safety Precautions of Pipeline Supply Chain Aiming at Zero Accidents
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Oil and gas accidents typically involve leaks from pipelines that disrupt normal operations, particularly in pipeline sections. However, China's existing trunk pipeline capacity is insufficient, and the degree of pipeline networking is still low. Additionally, the construction of natural gas peak-shaving facilities supporting pipelines lags behind, some pipelines are aging, and safety hazards are prevalent. Moreover, the government supervision and legal systems remain imperfect. This paper adopts a case study approach to examine recent incidents in Jiangxi Province and identify shortcomings in China's oil and gas pipeline transportation. It is clear that China
must accelerate the construction of pipeline transportation networks and supporting natural gas peak shaving facilities, promote scientific and technological advancements in pipeline transportation, and adopt a multipronged approach to ensure pipeline safety. Only then can China meet the requirements of resource diversification, supply networking, and deployment automation in oil and gas pipeline transportation
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Supply Chain and Sustainability Research uses a Gold Open Access model. All articles at Supply Chain and Sustainability Research are published Open Access. Publication is funded by a fee paid at the time of acceptance (Publication Fee). From June 2020 onward, author(s) retain copyright of their work, with articles licensed to the publisher Southeast Bangkok College and Supply Chain and Sustainability Research. All articles published on this site use the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (CC BY 4.0). You do not need to seek permission from Supply Chain and Sustainability Research or Southeast Bangkok College for reuse of contents published on this site.
This means;
All articles are immediately available free-of-charge upon publication.
Copyright on all Open Access articles in Supply Chain and Sustainability Research is retained by the author(s), or the author's Employer.
Author(s) grant Southeast Bangkok College a license to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher.
Author(s) also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and the original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
There may be exceptions to copyright and licensing for articles which were previously published under policies that are different from the above, in this case different licensing conditions may then apply. If in any case Supply Chain and Sustainability Research contains material republished with permission under a different license, you may need to seek permission for reuse from the copyright holder. In all such cases, however, access to these articles is free from fees or any other access restrictions.
Open Access ensures the widest possible access to research, makes research available to wider audiences, allows readers to use articles and data, and also allows author(s) to distribute their works freely. Open Access accelerates research by removing barriers to collaboration and accelerates scientific communication.
If you require more information, please don't be hesitated to contact the Editorial team anytime here or contact the Editorial Office below.
References
Abrahamsen, E. B., & Aven, T. (2012). Why risk acceptance criteria need to be defined by the authorities and not the industry? Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 105, 47-50.DOI：10.1016/j.ress.2011.11.004
Ale, B., Hartford, D., & Slater, D. (2015). Alarp and cba all in the same game. Safety Science, 76, 90-100.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.02.012
Alvarado-Franco, J. P., Castro, D., Estrada, N., Caicedo, B., Sánchez-Silva, M., & Camacho, L. A. (2017). Quantitative-mechanistic model for assessing landslide probability and pipeline failure probability due to landslides. Engineering Geology, S0013795217305562. DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.04.005
Bier, V. M. (2010). The US. nuclear regulatory commission safety goal policy: a critical review. Risk Analysis, 8(4), 563-568. DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924. 1988.tb01199.x
Gao, J., Zhao, Z., Song, W. U., Yan, D.U., Haojun, W. U., & Amp, P. (2017). Development of natural gas in typical countries in the world and its enlightenment. International Petroleum Economics. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7298.2017.08.010
Hu, G., Zhang, P., Wang, G., Zhang, M., & Li, M. (2017). The influence of rubber material on sealing performance of packing element in compression packer. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 38, 120-138. DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2016.12.027
Huang, H. (2011). Characteristics of cluster model in international electronic information industry and its enlightenment to China. Business Economy. DOI: 10.3969 /j.issn. 1009-6043. 2011.23.025
Li, S., Duan, Q., Zhang, H., & Wang, J. (2017). Failure analysis of the floating pipeline with defect under flooding load. Engineering Failure Analysis, 77, 65-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.02.011
Liu, H., & Cheng, Y. F. (2017). Mechanism of microbiologically influenced corrosion of x52 pipeline steel in a wet soil containing sulfate-reduced bacteria. Electrochimica Acta, 253, 368-378. DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.09.089
Netto, T. A., Ferraz, U. S., & Botto, A. (2007). On the effect of corrosion defects on the collapse pressure of pipelines. International Journal of Solids & Structures, 44(22-23), 7597-7614. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.04.028
Pei, J., Wang, G., Luo, S., & Luo, Y. (2018). Societal risk acceptance criteria for pressure pipelines in China. Safety Science, 109, 20-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.05.006
Qi, Z., & Zhang, W. (2009). Lessons from the U.S. natural gas industry. International Petroleum Economics.
DOI: 10.2118/130113-MS
Starr, C. (1969). Social benefit versus technological risk. Science, 165(3899), 1232-1238. DOI: 10.1126/science.165.3899.1232
Wang, H., Xu, J., Sheng, L., Liu, X., Lund, H., & Kaiser, M. J. (2018). Effect of addition of biogas slurry for anaerobic fermentation of deer manure on biogas production. Energy, Volume 165, Part B, 15 December 2018, Pages 411-418. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.196
Wang, F., Feng, Q., Cui, C., & Hu, A. (2017). Research on China's natural gas differential price system. Natural Gas Industry, 37(12), 7. DOI:10.3787 /j.issn. 1000-0976. 2017.12.017.
Zhao, D., Zhao, X., Khongnawang, T., Arshad, M., & Triantafilis, J. (2018). A vis-nir spectral library to predict clay in australian cotton growing soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 82. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2018.03.0100