Integrating Carbon Credits into Supply Chain Decision Simulations: Environmental Analysis and Business Strategy Discourse
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
As global concerns about carbon emissions continue to escalate, effective carbon emission management has become a crucial aspect of business operations. This study aims to develop a simulation system centered on enterprises, incorporating carbon emission trading dynamics into comprehensive decision-making frameworks. Through environmental analysis, decision-making processes, and target management, this paper systematically models the business environment for enterprises under carbon emission constraints. Additionally, it explores the influence of carbon credit mechanisms on business strategies. The simulation system endeavors to serve as an experimental platform for researchers and business managers, enabling them to conduct simulation tests and refine strategies. Ultimately, it seeks to help enterprises navigate the challenges of carbon emission management and achieve mutually beneficial outcomes for both the environment and the economy.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Supply Chain and Sustainability Research uses a Gold Open Access model. All articles at Supply Chain and Sustainability Research are published Open Access. Publication is funded by a fee paid at the time of acceptance (Publication Fee). From June 2020 onward, author(s) retain copyright of their work, with articles licensed to the publisher Southeast Bangkok College and Supply Chain and Sustainability Research. All articles published on this site use the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (CC BY 4.0). You do not need to seek permission from Supply Chain and Sustainability Research or Southeast Bangkok College for reuse of contents published on this site.
This means;
All articles are immediately available free-of-charge upon publication.
Copyright on all Open Access articles in Supply Chain and Sustainability Research is retained by the author(s), or the author's Employer.
Author(s) grant Southeast Bangkok College a license to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher.
Author(s) also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and the original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
There may be exceptions to copyright and licensing for articles which were previously published under policies that are different from the above, in this case different licensing conditions may then apply. If in any case Supply Chain and Sustainability Research contains material republished with permission under a different license, you may need to seek permission for reuse from the copyright holder. In all such cases, however, access to these articles is free from fees or any other access restrictions.
Open Access ensures the widest possible access to research, makes research available to wider audiences, allows readers to use articles and data, and also allows author(s) to distribute their works freely. Open Access accelerates research by removing barriers to collaboration and accelerates scientific communication.
If you require more information, please don't be hesitated to contact the Editorial team anytime here or contact the Editorial Office below.
References
Bernarto, I., Berlianto, M. P., Meilani, Y. F. C. P., Masman, R. R., & Suryawan, I. N. (2020). The influence of brand awareness, brand image, and brand trust on brand loyalty. Jurnal Manajemen, 24(3), 412-426.
Flood, M. M. (1952). On game-learning theory and some decision-making experiments (p. 0040). Rand Corporation.
He, B., Liu, Y., Zeng, L., Wang, S., Zhang, D., & Yu, Q. (2019). Product carbon footprint across sustainable supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 241, 118320.
Jia, Z., & Lin, B. (2020). Rethinking the choice of carbon tax and carbon trading in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 159, 120187.
Larson, K. (2019). The corporate playground: a review on game-based learning in enterprise training. In E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 737-748). Association For the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Li, G., Wang, X., Su, S., & Su, Y. (2019). How green technological innovation ability influences enterprise competitiveness. Technology in Society, 59, 101136.
Li, J., Lin, Y., Sun, M., & Shadiev, R. (2023). Socially shared regulation of learning in game-based collaborative learning environments promotes algorithmic thinking, learning participation and positive learning attitudes. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(3), 1715-1726.
Li, T. T., Wang, K., Sueyoshi, T., & Wang, D. D. (2021). ESG: Research progress and future prospects. Sustainability, 13(21), 11663.
Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pörtner, H. O., Roberts, D., Skea, J., & Shukla, P. R. (2022). Global Warming of 1.5 C: IPCC special report on impacts of global warming of 1.5 C above pre-industrial levels in context of strengthening response to climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, I., Warmelink, H., & Bekebrede, G. (2013). Learning in a game-based virtual environment: a comparative evaluation in higher education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 38(1), 85-106.
Milosz, E., & Milosz, M. (2014). Small computer enterprise on competitive market–decision simulation game for business training of computer science specialist. In ICERI2014 Proceedings (pp. 1831-1838). IATED.
Mishan, E. J., & Quah, E. (2020). Cost-benefit analysis. Routledge.
Nadolny, L., & Halabi, A. (2016). Student participation and achievement in a large lecture course with game-based learning. Simulation & Gaming, 47(1), 51-72.
Penz, E., & Polsa, P. (2018). How do companies reduce their carbon footprint and how do they communicate these measures to stakeholders?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 195, 1125-1138.
Rizan, C., Bhutta, M. F., Reed, M., & Lillywhite, R. (2021). The carbon footprint of waste streams in a UK hospital. Journal of Cleaner Production, 286, 125446.
Seo, K., Tang, J., Roll, I., Fels, S., & Yoon, D. (2021). The impact of artificial intelligence on learner–instructor interaction in online learning. International journal of educational technology in higher education, 18, 1-23.
Schrader, C., & Bastiaens, T. J. (2012). The influence of virtual presence: Effects on experienced cognitive load and learning outcomes in educational computer games. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 648-658.
Wang, W., & Zhang, Y. J. (2022). Does China's carbon emissions trading scheme affect the market power of high-carbon enterprises?. Energy Economics, 108, 105906.
Wiedmann, T., & Minx, J. (2008). A definition of ‘carbon footprint’. Ecological economics research trends, 1(2008), 1-11.
Wu, W. H., Hsiao, H. C., Wu, P. L., Lin, C. H., & Huang, S. H. (2012). Investigating the learning‐theory foundations of game‐based learning: a meta‐analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(3), 265-279.
Ziabina, Y., & Dzwigol-Barosz, M. (2022). A Country's Green Brand and the Social Responsibility of Business. Virtual Economics, 5(3), 31-49.