Performance Evaluation on the Promotion of Rural Health Teaching Strategybased on DEA Analysis in China
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The urbanization development has resulted in young farmers’ emigration to big cities, and the left middle aged and elderly farmers generally show declining physical and mental functions and are suffering from chronic diseases. Physical health is the major demands of the middle aged and the elderly. To protect the physical and mental health and enhance the quality of life, the government has positively promotion of rural health teaching strategy to reinforce preventive health care, make screening, and manage and prevent chronic
diseases. In this study, Delphi Method is utilized for drafting the performance evaluation indicators for rural health teaching strategy and Data Envelopment Analysis is applied to evaluate efficiency. Taking Zhejiang Province as the research object, cities in Zhejiang Province are selected total 13 DMUs in this study. The research results show that 1. 1 DMU presents strong rural health teaching strategy efficiency, 5 DMUs reveal the rural health teaching strategy practice efficiency in 0.9 and 1, and 7 DMUs appear the rural health teaching strategy practice efficiency lower than 0.9 and 2. the key factors in rural health teaching strategy are found out through sensitivity analysis to understand the sensitivity to efficiency. Finally, suggestions are proposed according to the results, expecting to help farmers present the knowledge and skill about disease prevention and health enhancement so as to promote self-preventive health care and further enhance health quality.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Supply Chain and Sustainability Research uses a Gold Open Access model. All articles at Supply Chain and Sustainability Research are published Open Access. Publication is funded by a fee paid at the time of acceptance (Publication Fee). From June 2020 onward, author(s) retain copyright of their work, with articles licensed to the publisher Southeast Bangkok College and Supply Chain and Sustainability Research. All articles published on this site use the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (CC BY 4.0). You do not need to seek permission from Supply Chain and Sustainability Research or Southeast Bangkok College for reuse of contents published on this site.
This means;
All articles are immediately available free-of-charge upon publication.
Copyright on all Open Access articles in Supply Chain and Sustainability Research is retained by the author(s), or the author's Employer.
Author(s) grant Southeast Bangkok College a license to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher.
Author(s) also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and the original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
There may be exceptions to copyright and licensing for articles which were previously published under policies that are different from the above, in this case different licensing conditions may then apply. If in any case Supply Chain and Sustainability Research contains material republished with permission under a different license, you may need to seek permission for reuse from the copyright holder. In all such cases, however, access to these articles is free from fees or any other access restrictions.
Open Access ensures the widest possible access to research, makes research available to wider audiences, allows readers to use articles and data, and also allows author(s) to distribute their works freely. Open Access accelerates research by removing barriers to collaboration and accelerates scientific communication.
If you require more information, please don't be hesitated to contact the Editorial team anytime here or contact the Editorial Office below.
References
Bedardb, J. C., Gopi, B. R., & Vijayalakshmi, B. (2015). A multiple criteria model for audit planning decisions, Contemporary Accounting Research, v8, n.1, p.293-308.
Bo, M., Amprino, V., Dalmasso, P., Argentero, P., & Zotti, C. (2015). Written versus verbal information for patients'' teaching strategy on healthcare-associated infections: a cross-sectional study, Journal Of Hospital Infection, v.91, n.4, p.358-361.
Cairney, D. T., & Stewart, E. G. (2015). Audit fees and client industry homogeneity, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, v.34, n. 4, p.33-57.
Clark, D. B., Tanner-Smith, E. E., & Killingsworth, S. S. (2016). Digital games, design, and learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Review of teaching strategical research, 86(1), 79-122.
Fatemeh, B., & Pourmahmoud, J. (2016). A modified SBM-NDEA approach for the efficiency measurement in bank branches. Annals of Operations Research 16(2): 301–326.
Kang, M., Kim, J. W., Lee, H. Y., & Lee, M. G. (2015). Financial statement comparability and audit efficiency: Evidence from South Korea, Applied Economics, Vol. 47, No. 4, 358-373.
Kendrick, D., Maula, A., Reading, R., Hindmarch, P., Coupland, C., Watson, M., & Deave, T. (2015). Risk and protective factors for falls from furniture in young children: multicenter case-control study. JAMA pediatrics, 169(2), 145-153.
Kramlich, D. L., & Dende, D. (2016). Development of a pediatric fall risk and injury reduction program.Pediatric nursing, 42(2), 77.
Ohsatoa, S., & Takahashi, M. (2015). Management efficiency in Japanese regional banks: A network DEA. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 172: 511-518.
Velasco, H. F., Cabral, C. Z., Pinheiro, P. P., Rita de Cassia, S. A., Vitola, L. S., da Costa, M. R., & Amant, S. L. (2015). Use of digital media for the teaching strategy of health professionals in the treatment of childhood asthma.Jornal de Pediatria, 91(2), 183-188.
Von Meyer-Hoefer, M., Von Der Wense, V., & Spiller, A. (2015). Characterising convinced sustainable food consumers. British Food Journal, 117(3), 1082-1104.
Wang, Y- F. (2016). Development and validation of the green food and beverage literacy scale. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 21(1), 20-56.
Wang, Y- F., & Wang, C.- Z. (2016). Do psychological factors affect green food and beverage behavior? An application of the theory of planned behavior. British Food Journal, 118 (9), 2171-2199.
Wu, J. R., Moser, D.K., DeWalt, D. A., Rayens, M.K., & Dracup, K. (2016). Health Literacy Mediates the Relationship Between Age and Health Outcomes in Patients with Heart Failure. American Heart Association, 9(1), e002250.
Zhou, L., & Zhu, S. (2017). Research on the efficiency of Chinese commercial banks based on undesirable output and super SBM DEA Model. Journal of Mathematical Finance. 7: 102-120