The The Development of a Leadership Potential Model for Driving Innovation in Thai Industries under a Disruptive Economy
Keywords:
Leadership Potential, Innovation, Thai Industry, Disruptive EconomyAbstract
This research aimed to develop a leadership potential model for driving innovation in Thai industries within a disruptive economy. A mixed-methods approach was employed, beginning with qualitative in-depth interviews with seven senior executives from Thai industries, followed by a 103-item survey of 403 managerial-level leaders. Data were analyzed using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), and the resulting model was validated through a focus group with fifteen experts. The analysis identified a three-dimensional model—(1) Self-Leadership, (2) Team Leadership, and (3) Organizational Leadership—comprising sixteen sub-components and twenty-nine sub-elements. This framework advances existing leadership theories by incorporating digital agility, sustainability, and ethical considerations into the Thai industrial context. Expert validation further confirmed its suitability for practical application. Overall, the study contributes a context-specific framework that can guide organizations and policymakers in assessing and developing leaders to navigate the complexities of a disruptive economy.
References
Christensen, C. M., Raynor, M. E., & McDonald, R. (2015). What is disruptive innovation? Harvard Business Review, 93(12), 44–53.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
Kane, G. C., Palmer, D., Phillips, A. N., Kiron, D., & Buckley, N. (2019). Accelerating digital innovation inside and out: Agile teams, ecosystems, and ethics. MIT Sloan Management Review, 60(3), 34–43.
Manz, C. C. (1986). Self-leadership: Toward an expanded theory of self-influence processes in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 585–600. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4306232
McKinsey & Company. (2018, October). Unlocking success in digital transformations. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/unlocking-success-in-digital-transformations
Nanus, B. (1992). Visionary leadership: Creating a compelling sense of direction for your organization. Jossey-Bass.
National Economic and Social Development Council & World Bank. (2021). Thailand Economic Monitor: The road to recovery. World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/35931
PwC. (2023). 26th Annual Global CEO Survey. PricewaterhouseCoopers. https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/ceo-survey/2023.html
Schoemaker, P. J. H., Heaton, S., & Teece, D. J. (2018). Innovation, dynamic capabilities, and leadership. California Management Review, 61(1), 15–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125618790246
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
World Bank. (2019). World development report 2019: The changing nature of work. The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1328-3
World Bank. (2020). World development report 2020: Trading for development in the age of global value chains. The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1457-0
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Bansomdejchaopraya Rajabhat University
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
