Southeast Asia’s Carbon Credit Development From Carbon Colonialism to Carbon Sovereignty
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
- Development of Carbon Credit Sovereignty (Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand)
1.1 The Rise of Global Carbon Credit Markets
The formation of the carbon credit market began with global awareness of climate change and the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Mechanisms such as the Kyoto Protocol and later the Paris Agreement aimed to create a framework where countries could trade carbon credits and meet their emission reduction targets. Carbon credit markets are divided into compliance markets (RCM), governed by international agreements, and voluntary markets (VCM), where companies and governments can voluntarily trade and generate carbon credits to meet their carbon neutrality goals.
Southeast Asia plays a crucial role in the global carbon market due to its abundant natural resources, extensive forest cover, and renewable energy potential. Countries like Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Thailand have provided significant carbon credits, especially through CDM (Clean Development Mechanism) and REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation) projects. However, these contributions led to criticism, often termed “carbon colonialism,” where local communities and environments did not sufficiently benefit from these projects despite their critical role in offsetting emissions for developed countries.
1.2 Historical Background of Southeast Asia’s Development
Historically, Southeast Asia has relied on its agricultural and natural resources as a primary economic driver. This dependency has made the region a crucial source of carbon credit generation. However, challenges remain, such as balancing economic growth with environmental preservation, ensuring fair participation in international carbon markets, and safeguarding national interests from exploitation. As the carbon market matured, these nations began transitioning from passive credit suppliers to more proactive actors in pursuing carbon sovereignty.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Supply Chain and Sustainability Research uses a Gold Open Access model. All articles at Supply Chain and Sustainability Research are published Open Access. Publication is funded by a fee paid at the time of acceptance (Publication Fee). From June 2020 onward, author(s) retain copyright of their work, with articles licensed to the publisher Southeast Bangkok College and Supply Chain and Sustainability Research. All articles published on this site use the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (CC BY 4.0). You do not need to seek permission from Supply Chain and Sustainability Research or Southeast Bangkok College for reuse of contents published on this site.
This means;
All articles are immediately available free-of-charge upon publication.
Copyright on all Open Access articles in Supply Chain and Sustainability Research is retained by the author(s), or the author's Employer.
Author(s) grant Southeast Bangkok College a license to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher.
Author(s) also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and the original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
There may be exceptions to copyright and licensing for articles which were previously published under policies that are different from the above, in this case different licensing conditions may then apply. If in any case Supply Chain and Sustainability Research contains material republished with permission under a different license, you may need to seek permission for reuse from the copyright holder. In all such cases, however, access to these articles is free from fees or any other access restrictions.
Open Access ensures the widest possible access to research, makes research available to wider audiences, allows readers to use articles and data, and also allows author(s) to distribute their works freely. Open Access accelerates research by removing barriers to collaboration and accelerates scientific communication.
If you require more information, please don't be hesitated to contact the Editorial team anytime here or contact the Editorial Office below.
References
Bachram, H. (2004). Climate fraud and carbon colonialism: the new trade in greenhouse gases. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 15(4), 5-20.
Barbier, E. (2019). Natural resources and economic development. Cambridge University Press.
Blum, M. (2020). The legitimation of contested carbon markets after Paris–empirical insights from market stakeholders. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22(2), 226-238.
Change, I. P. O. C. (2007). Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Agenda, 6(07), 333.
Change, U. C. (2015). The Paris Agreement. United Nations.
Hossain, M., Huda, A. S. N., Mekhilef, S., Seyedmahmoudian, M., Horan, B., Stojcevski, A., & Ahmed, M. (2018). A state-of-the-art review of hydropower in Malaysia as renewable energy: Current status and future prospects. Energy Strategy Reviews, 22, 426-437.
Kliem, F. (2024). Toward a Low-Carbon Economy in Southeast Asia: Opportunities and Obstacles for Energy Transition Mechanisms. Transforming ASEAN: Strategies for Achieving Inclusive.
Marquardt, J., Delina, L. L., & Smits, M. (2021). Governing Climate Change in Southeast Asia. Critical Perspectives. 1st ed. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429324680.
Peou, R., Muiderman, K., Vervoort, J. M., & Verkuil, L. (2021). Anticipatory climate governance in Southeast Asia.
Protocol, K. (2010). Framework convention on climate change. Kyoto Protocol, 7(2), 4-75.
Rosales, R. C., Bellino, P., Elnahass, M., Heubaum, H., Lim, P., Lemaistre, P., ... & Sjögersten, S. (2021). Voluntary Carbon Markets in ASEAN: Challenges and Opportunities for Scaling Up.
Santikarn, M., Churie Kallhauge, A. N., Bozcaga, M. O., Sattler, L., Mccormick, M. S., Ferran Torres, A., ... & Korthuis, A. (2021). State and trends of carbon pricing 2021.
Sen, S., & Sahoo, P. (2024). World Development Perspectives. World Development, 34, 100586.
Singh, A. K., Singh, B. K., Kumar, N. M., Karada, M. S., Agnihotri, D., & Singh, R. (2023). Agroforestry as a mechanism for reforestation: scenarios within REDD. Biol Forum Int J (Vol. 15, No. 7), 370-377.
Stephan, B. (2013). Not seeing the forest for the carbon in the trees? The role of fighting tropical deforestation in global climate governance (Doctoral dissertation, Universität Hamburg Hamburg).
Wartini, S. (2024). The Impacts of REDD+ to The Protection of Indigenous People’s Rights in Developing Countries Based on International Law Perspective. E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 594, p. 04006). EDP Sciences.
