Adoption of Sales Force Automation Systems in Supply Chain Management: A Technology Acceptance Model Perspective
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purposes of this study were to 1) apply the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) for sales force in the supply chain system by integrating external variables, namely Self-Efficacy and Organizational Support, 2) examine their effects on Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) and Perceived Usefulness (PU) and, 3) investigate users’ attitudes and intention to use. The instruments were questionnaires. The sample was 288 employees working in the automotive supply chain industry. The statistical analysis was Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). The results showed that Self-Efficacy had a significant positive effect on PEOU, while Organizational Support positively influenced PU. Both PEOU and PU indirectly affected intention to use through users’ attitudes. This study not only confirmed the suitability of TAM in the supply chain context but also provided practical implications that supported organizations in driving their digital transformation.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Supply Chain and Sustainability Research uses a Gold Open Access model. All articles at Supply Chain and Sustainability Research are published Open Access. Publication is funded by a fee paid at the time of acceptance (Publication Fee). From June 2020 onward, author(s) retain copyright of their work, with articles licensed to the publisher Southeast Bangkok College and Supply Chain and Sustainability Research. All articles published on this site use the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (CC BY 4.0). You do not need to seek permission from Supply Chain and Sustainability Research or Southeast Bangkok College for reuse of contents published on this site.
This means;
All articles are immediately available free-of-charge upon publication.
Copyright on all Open Access articles in Supply Chain and Sustainability Research is retained by the author(s), or the author's Employer.
Author(s) grant Southeast Bangkok College a license to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher.
Author(s) also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and the original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
There may be exceptions to copyright and licensing for articles which were previously published under policies that are different from the above, in this case different licensing conditions may then apply. If in any case Supply Chain and Sustainability Research contains material republished with permission under a different license, you may need to seek permission for reuse from the copyright holder. In all such cases, however, access to these articles is free from fees or any other access restrictions.
Open Access ensures the widest possible access to research, makes research available to wider audiences, allows readers to use articles and data, and also allows author(s) to distribute their works freely. Open Access accelerates research by removing barriers to collaboration and accelerates scientific communication.
If you require more information, please don't be hesitated to contact the Editorial team anytime here or contact the Editorial Office below.
References
Avlonitis, G. J., & Panagopoulos, N. G. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of CRM technology acceptance in the sales force. Industrial Marketing Management, 34(4), 355–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2004.09.021
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1997-08589-000
Boujena, O., Johnston, W. J., & Merunka, D. (2009). The benefits of sales force automation: A customer’s perspective. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 29(2), 137–150. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261645502
Burton-Jones, A., & Hubona, G. S. (2006). The mediation of external variables in the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 43(6), 706–717. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378720606000300
Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/249688
Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2016). Supply chain management: Strategy, planning, and operation (6th ed.). Pearson. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327890174
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://www.jstor.org/stable/249008
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500–507. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500
Queiroz, M., Wamba, S. F., & Queiroz, J. (2019). Blockchain adoption in supply chain management: Empirical evidence from an emerging economy. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), 2025–2043. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1552076
Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698–714. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232493553
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926