A Study on Financial Social Work Participation in Asset Building for Thailand's Vulnerable Families
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Financial social work is based on the political framework of asset construction theory, which aims to help vulnerable groups carry out inclusive financial services and promote the process of financial empowerment. Its practical experience in neighboring Bangladesh has achieved many good results, but its practical experience in Thailand is relatively lacking. Starting from the theory of the poor bank, this paper selects the rural poor families in Thailand as the research object, combining with the "adequacy economics" of King Rama IX of Thailand, the "Thaksin economics" of former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra, and the Royal Thai major agricultural project "hope and change - financial social work involved in the development plan of children in distress". This paper selects 10 Thailand's troubled families who receive services to conduct field surveys and research interviews on the issue of financial and social work's involvement in the construction of troubled children's family assets. The comparison of unstructured interviews conducted separately in the service conclusion shows that more than 80% of the financial service objects have improved their family financial planning ability, student employment, and the entrepreneurial effect of agricultural loans because they accepted this service.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Supply Chain and Sustainability Research uses a Gold Open Access model. All articles at Supply Chain and Sustainability Research are published Open Access. Publication is funded by a fee paid at the time of acceptance (Publication Fee). From June 2020 onward, author(s) retain copyright of their work, with articles licensed to the publisher Southeast Bangkok College and Supply Chain and Sustainability Research. All articles published on this site use the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (CC BY 4.0). You do not need to seek permission from Supply Chain and Sustainability Research or Southeast Bangkok College for reuse of contents published on this site.
This means;
All articles are immediately available free-of-charge upon publication.
Copyright on all Open Access articles in Supply Chain and Sustainability Research is retained by the author(s), or the author's Employer.
Author(s) grant Southeast Bangkok College a license to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher.
Author(s) also grant any third party the right to use the article freely as long as its integrity is maintained and the original authors, citation details and publisher are identified.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
There may be exceptions to copyright and licensing for articles which were previously published under policies that are different from the above, in this case different licensing conditions may then apply. If in any case Supply Chain and Sustainability Research contains material republished with permission under a different license, you may need to seek permission for reuse from the copyright holder. In all such cases, however, access to these articles is free from fees or any other access restrictions.
Open Access ensures the widest possible access to research, makes research available to wider audiences, allows readers to use articles and data, and also allows author(s) to distribute their works freely. Open Access accelerates research by removing barriers to collaboration and accelerates scientific communication.
If you require more information, please don't be hesitated to contact the Editorial team anytime here or contact the Editorial Office below.
References
Arnold, E. M., Artin, K. A., Griffith, D., Person, J. L., & Graham, K. G. (2007). Unmet needs at the end of life: Perceptions of hospice social workers. Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care, 2(4), 61–83.
Boucher, N. A., Kuchibhatla, M., & Johnson, K. S. (2017). Meeting basic needs: Social supports and services provided by hospice. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 20(6), 642–646.
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Free Press.
Oliver, D. P., & Peck, M. (2006). Inside the interdisciplinary team: Experiences of hospice social workers. Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care, 2(3), 7–21.
Reese, D. J., & Csikai, E. L. (2018). Social work assessment and outcomes measurement in hospice and palliative care. Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care, 14(2–3), 89–104.
