Mercy and Justice as Civil Virtues in Multicultural Society in Buddhist Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69598/artssu.2023.1491.Keywords:
mercy, justice, Buddhism, Aristotle, NussbaumAbstract
Objectives: The objectives of this article are 1) to study and analyze the relationship between mercy and justice as citizen virtues from the Buddhist perspective using Aristotle's concept of eudaimonia, developed by Martha Nusbaum as a framework for the analysis, and 2) to apply the principle of mercy to create justice in a multicultural society.
Methods: The study gathered information from the Tipitaka and commentary. Academic documents related to Buddhism were also analyzed and interpreted with the concepts of Western philosophy.
Results: The study found that mercy is related to justice at the conceptual level, not just at the level of social rules.That is, justice is an important condition which prompts moral emotion (mercy) of the virtuous, but at the same time limits the expression of mercy. However, realizing that everyone desires a prosperous life, every person should be treated equally. When a person is not treated with justice, the virtuous are obligated to create social justice. When applying these two virtues in a multicultural society, mercy plays a role in pursuing social justice by realizing that everyone wants a prosperous life, therefore despite cultural differences, all men should be allowed to participate in the process of developing social justice.
Application of this study: The results of the study can be applied to moral cultivation for the coexistence of people in a multicultural society.
Downloads
References
Archawanantakul, S. (trans.). (2011). Justice: What’s the Right Thing to Do ?. by Michael J. Sandel. Bangkok: Open World Publishing. (In Thai)
Aristotle. (2022). POLITICS: Principles of Political Science and Political Philosophy of Ancient Greece in the Imperial Era. Supasilp, S. (trans.). Nonthaburi: Tubnangseu Publishing. (In Thai)
Blumenthal, J. (2009). Toward A Buddhist Theory of Justice. Journal of Global Buddhism; Penrith South, 10, 321-349.
Boonnoon, C. (2007). Justice in Tipitakas. Full Report funded by Thailand Research Fund. (In Thai)
Boonnoon, C. (2016). Moral Status of Family in Buddhism. in Satha-Anand (ed.), Mapping Ethics (pp.41-108). Bangkok: Vibhasa Press. (In Thai)
Boonnoon, C. (2019). No Questions for Makhandiya: An Analysis of the Concept of Justice through “Silence” of Monks in the Stories of “Withuthabha” and “Samawati” in Dhamapada commentary. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research in Asia, 25(1), 159-192. (In Thai)
Brück, M. V. (n.d.). An Ethics of Justice in Buddhism seen in a Cross-Cultural Context. Retrieved 15 August 2022, from https://www.totetu.org/assets/media/paper/j019_158.pdf.
Buddhadasa B. (2006). Dhamma and Politics. Bangkok: Sukkhapabchai Publishing. (In Thai)
Boonyanate, N. (2014). Justice in The Crime of Passion. Bangkok: Kobfai Publishing Project. (In Thai)
Changkwanyuen, P. (1991). Political Thought in Tipitaka. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press. (In Thai)
Korsgaard, C. M. (1996). Creating the Kingdom of Ends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mahachulalongkorn University. (1996a). Thai Tipitakas, Volume 11. Bangkok: MCU Press. (In Thai)
Mahachulalongkorn University. (1996b). Thai Tipitakas, Volume 13. Bangkok: MCU Press. (In Thai)
Mahachulalongkorn University. (1996c). Thai Tipitakas, Volume 16. Bangkok: MCU Press. (In Thai)
Mahachulalongkorn University. (1996d). Thai Tipitakas, Volume 25. Bangkok: MCU Press. (In Thai)
Mahamakut Buddhist University. (2000a). Sutra and Commentary, volume 40. 4th ed. Bangkok: MBU Press. (In Thai)
Mahamakut Buddhist University. (2000b). Sutra and Commentary, volume 41. 4th ed. Bangkok: MBU Press. (In Thai)
Mahamakut Buddhist University (2000c). Sutra and Commentary, volume 42. 4th ed. Bangkok: MBU Press. (In Thai)
Naktranun, C. (2021). The Compatibility between Justice and Mercy. Rajapark Journal, 15(42), 102-116. (In Thai)
Ngamchitcharoen, V. (2005). Justice and Care in Feminist Ethics. Journal of Liberal Arts, 5(2), 1-36. (In Thai)
Nualnirun, J. (2000). Does mercy really lead to equality?: A comparison of the perspectives of Nietzsche and Buddha. Journal of Buddhist Studies Chulalongkorn University, 7(1), 36-48. (In Thai)
Nussbaum, M. C. (2001). Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. USA.: Harvard University Press.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2007). Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pholcharoen, W. (2018). Collection of Articles on Political Science and Public Administration. Mahasarakham: Apichat Printing. (In Thai)
Pholcharoen, W. (2019). Collection of Articles on Buddhism and Society and politics. Mahasarakham: Apichat Printing. (In Thai)
Phra Dhammapitaka (P. A. Payutto). (1995). Buddhadhamma, adapted and expanded version. Bangkok: Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University. (In Thai)
Phra Dhammapitaka (P. A. Payutto). (2000). Buddhist Dictionary. Vocabulary edition. Bangkok: Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University. (In Thai)
Phrathepwedi (Prayut Payutto). (1989). Buddhism and Thai Society. Bangkok: Komol Keemthong Foundation. (In Thai)
Promta, S. (2005a). Buddhist Philosophy: Man, Society and Ethical Problems. Bangkok: Sayam Publishing. (In Thai)
Promta, S. (2005b). Buddhism and The Death Penalty. Journal of Buddhist Studies Chulalongkorn University, 12(3), 5-116. (In Thai)
Promta, S. (2016). Buddhist Philosophy in Abhidhamma Pitaka. Nonthaburi: Panyachat Books Buying. (In Thai)
Royal Institute. (1980). Royal Institute Dictionary, 1950. 18th ed. Bangkok: Nonthachai Limited Partnership. (In Thai)
Royal Institute. (2003). Royal Institute Dictionary 1999. Bangkok: Nanmee Books Publications. (In Thai)
Royal Institute. (2004). Vocabulary of Law English-Thai Thai-English Royal Institute Edition. Bangkok: Royal Institute. (In Thai)
Satha-anand, S. (ed.). (2022). Buddhist Pluralism volume 3 Tracing: James, Heidegger, Taylor, Ricoeur. Bangkok: TSRI-Senior Research Project Fellowship, Kobfai Publishing Project. (In Thai)
Sen, A. (2012). Identity and violence. An illusion of Destiny. Klampaiboon, S. (trans.). Nakhon Pathom: Institute of Human Rights and Peace Studies. (In Thai)
Singsuriya, P. (2016). Recognition in Paul Ricoeur’s Philosophy. in Satha-Anand, (ed.), Mapping Ethics (pp.467-526). Bangkok: Vibhasa Press. (In Thai)
Singsuriya, P. (2022). Charles Taylor’s Theory of Multiculturalism. In Satha-anand, S. (ed.), Buddhist Pluralism volume 3 Tracing: James, Heidegger, Taylor, Ricoeur (pp.290-350). Bangkok: TSRI-Senior Research Project Fellowship, Kobfai Publishing Project. (In Thai)
Szabo, T. G. (2022). Conclusion: Designing Organizations with Love: An ACT Prosocial Framework for Social Justice, Diversity, and Inclusion. In Sadavoy, J. A. and Zube, M. L. (ed.). A Scientific Framework for Compassion and Social Justice: Lessons in Applied Behavior Analysis. (pp.314-325). New York: Routledge.
Taweesak, S. (2009). Buddhist Morality and Universal Ethics. Journal of Buddhist Studies Chulalongkorn University, 26(2), 51-72. (In Thai)
Thianpratuangchai, M. (2014). Concept of Social Justice in Buddhist Philosophy. Humanities Journal, 21(2), 165-192. (In Thai)
Triayawong, K. (2016). Face-to-Face Relation as a Condition for Ethics in Emmanuel Levinas’ Philosophy. in Satha-Anand, (ed.), Mapping Ethics (pp.411-464). Bangkok: Vibhasa Press. (In Thai)
Triayawong, K. (2018). Towards Coexistence with The Other: An Interpretation of Paul Ricoeur’ Philosophy. In Saowanit Chulawong (ed.), Debating on Values II: On Cultural Diversity (pp.99-139). Bangkok: Vibhasa Publishing. (In Thai)
Wimaladhamma, K. (2015). The Concept of Justice in Aristotle’s and Theravada Buddhist Ethics. Retrieved 5 May 2022, From https://researchgate.net/publication/272421052.
Zube, M. (2022). Introduction: Metta-Contingencies. In Sadavoy, J. A. and Zube, M. L. (ed.). A Scientific Framework for Compassion and Social Justice: Lessons in Applied Behavior Analysis. (pp.1-7). New York: Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Arts and Thai Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
