The Speech Act of Instructing in Thai: A Case Study of Parent and Children in Lopburi Province
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objectives: This research aims to study language strategies used for the speech act of instructing and the relationship between language strategies and parents’ education level.
Methods: Research data were collected from a discourse-completion task (WDCT). The research population comprised 100 parents in Lopburi province who were selected by purposive sampling and were divided into two groups: 1) 50 parents who did not hold a bachelor’s degree and 2) 50 parents who held a bachelor’s degree or other post-graduate degrees. The data was analyzed using frequency and percentage to determine the relationship between the parent’s education levels and their language strategies usage.
Results: The results suggested that the parents employed thirteen language strategies for the speech act of instructing, which were categorized into two groups: bold on-record and off-record strategies. Ranking from the most frequently used strategies to the least, the bold on-record strategies included 1) commanding, 2) reprimanding, and 3) threatening. The off-record strategies included 1) giving advice, 2) using expressions to give opinions, 3) using expressions to give questions, 4) using the expression to show conditions, 5) reasoning, 6) offering assistance, 7) referring to a person, rule, or regulation, 8) requesting, 9) giving examples of consequences from the action, and 10) giving compliments. From the results, the samples used the off-record strategies more than the bold on-record strategies. Moreover, education level also influenced the language strategy usage. The results also reflect three types of social characteristics in Thai society: 1) high power distance, 2) collectivism, and 3) high context communication.
Application of this study: The results could be a model for research studies of the same or different pragmatic types and contexts. They could also be employed for the cross-cultural study on speech acts based on the interlanguage pragmatics notion, which could lead to a huge contribution to Thai language teaching for foreign learners.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Amarin. (2021). Gang Jo Pha Phean Pai Tai 2 Sop Root Khama Mae Phean Tuentun Dai Khati “Kid Ja Bouk Tong Mee Arvoot”. [Teen Gang Vilolence Led to 2 Friends Killed, Asked Mom for Forgiveness, “Arms Needed When Fight Back”, Lesson Learned.]. Retrieved 15 October 2021, from https://www.amarintv.com/news/detail/102916 (In Thai)
Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s consequence: international differences in work-related Values. Beverly Hill: Sage Pub.
Hofstede, G. (2003). Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, institutions and Organizations Across Nations. 2nd ed. New York: Sage.
Hall, Edward T. (1959). The Silent Language. New York: Doubleday & Company.
Hanks, W. F., Ide, S., & Katakiri, Y. (2009). Towards an Emancipatory Pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(1), 1-9.
Ide, S. (1989). Formal Forms and Discernment: Two Neglected Aspects of Universals of Linguistic Politeness. Multilingua, 8, 23-248.
Kunlawanich & Others. (1997). Phasathatsana. [Aspects of Language]. 4th ed. Bangkok: Faculty of Arts Textbook Project Chulalongkorn University. (In Thai)
Lopburi Provincial Office Strategy and Information Division for Provincial Development. (2020). Lopburi Province Development Plan (2018 - 2022), Revised Edition 2022. Retrieved 15 October 2021, from http://www.oic.go.th/FILEWEB/CABINFOCENTER2/DRAWER059/GENERAL/DATA0000/00000158.PDF (In Thai)
Morsaowapaleanglookchengbouk. (2017). 4 Communication styles that must think carefully before speaking. Retrieved 15 October 2021, from https://www.facebook.com/PositiveparentingDr.saowapa/ (In Thai)
Ongwutthiwat. (2006). The Speech Act of Admonishing In Thai: A Case Study of Teachers And Student.
Master Thesis, M.A. in Information Studies, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand. (In Thai)
Panpothong, N. (2012). Course teaching document 2201783 An analysis of the Thai language according to pragmatic approaches. (revised edition). Department of Thai Language Faculty of Arts Chulalongkorn University. Reproduce. (In Thai)
Searle, J. R. (1965). What is Speech Act?. Philosophy in America, 231-239.
Srinarawat, D. (2013). Indirectness as a Communicative Strategy of Thai Speakers. Journal of Liberal Arts Thammasat University, 1(2), 85-101. (In Thai)