The Conversational Discourse Elements related to Donation: A Conversation Analysis Approach
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objectives: This article aims to analyze the conversational discourse elements related to donation.
Methods: This research is language research. Qualitative research methods were used. It uses Conversational Analysis of Sacks, Schegloff, and Jefferson’s (1974) serves as a framework for analyzing the conversational discourse about "donation" which are produced and published by youtube channel Pimrypie of 82 videos.
Results: The conversational discourse elements related to donation. It was revealed that there were 8 components of conversational discourse elements related to donation: interruption, overlapping, other repetition, terminate, repair, silence, feedback, and backchannel. It was able to explain that which interlocutor tends to influence or control the behavior of others when interacting.
Application of this study: The study of conversational discourse elements provided the understanding of power relations, power negotiation, and the role language in meaning construction of donation. Additionally, it was able to be way to the further study of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA).
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Angkapanichkit, J. (2019). Discourse analysis. Bangkok: Thammasat University Press. (In Thai)
AUN Thai Laboratories. (2022). Content Marketing. Retrieved 15 October 2022, from https://aun-thai.co.th/about-us/ (In Thai)
Chapimon, K. (2021). The discourse of monetary donation request in Thai social media: A critical discourse analysis. Doctoral Dissertation, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand. (In Thai)
Davidson, D. (1984). Communication and Convention. Cambridge: University Press.
Eakapont, T. (2022). The relationship between language and representation of spornosextual men toward social media. Doctoral Dissertation, Khon Kaen University, Thailand. (In Thai)
Hasanam, N. & Panpothong, N. (2022). Backchannels in Thai and the effects of status: A case study of conversation between teachers and students from the Mister O corpus. Manutsayasat Wichakan, 29(1),189-217. (In Thai)
Hasanam, N. & Panpothong, N. (2023). Conversational dominance in Thai language and factors relating to social status: A case study of conversation between teachers and students in Mister O corpus. Journal of art and Thai studies, 45(1), 1-17. (In Thai)
Jefferson, G. (1989). Preliminary notes on a possible metric which provides for a ‘standard maximum’ silence of approximately one second in conversation. In D. Roger and P. Bull (Eds.), Conversation: An interdisciplinary perspective, 166-196. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Khampha, N. (2015). Critical Discourse Analysis of the relationship between language and identity of people with disabilities in Thai society form the perspective of people with and without disabilities, 1991-2011. Doctoral Dissertation, Kasetsart University, Thailand. (In Thai)
Khueankaew, S., Sereechaikul, T., & Bumrungsuk, S. (2021). Structures of cosmetic sale conversations in online live. In Proceeding report of Thai language and culture network (3th), pp. 123-146, Bangkok: Ramkhamhaeng University. (In Thai)
Kogure, M. (2007). Nodding and smiling in silence during the loop sequence of backchannels in Japanese conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(7), 1275-1289.
Krutnate, P. (2014). Linguistic strategies used for terminating conflict talk in Thai interaction. Doctoral Dissertation, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand. (In Thai)
Nanthakanok, K. (2012). An analysis of conversational structures between local government officials and ethnic people. Master Thesis, Graduate school, Mahidol University, Thailand. (In Thai)
Ochaphan, S. (2022). Simultaneous speech in Thai conversation: A case study of Hone Krasae Telavision Program. Journal Thai language and literature, 39(1), 92-137. (In Thai)
Pankaew, N., & Buakaw, S. (2022). A Discourse Analysis of Conversation Interruption in a Thai News Interview Program. In CSEAS 14th international conference on Thai studies 29 April-1 May 2022. Kyoto: Japan.
Pimrypie Official. (2020). Pimrypie help playlist. Retrieved 22 September 2022, from https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLfjrWzx-Z9pM-3zl2V_bhWtwsxCic6GHF
Pimrypie Official. (2021). Pimrypie help playlist. Retrieved 22 September 2022, from https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLfjrWzx-Z9pM-3zl2V_bhWtwsxCic6GHF
Pimrypie Official. (2022). Pimrypie help playlist. Retrieved 22 September 2022, from https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLfjrWzx-Z9pM-3zl2V_bhWtwsxCic6GHF
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696-735.
Saisuwan, P. (2017). Conversational dominance in Thai male and female speech. In Amara Prasithrathsint (ed.). A collection of research papers in sociolinguistics and ethnolinguistics (pp. 298-331). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press. (In Thai)
Satham, S. (2017). A study of conversational discourse between psychiatrists and out-patients in primary psychiatric consultation. Doctoral Dissertation, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand. (In Thai)
van Dijk, T. A. (2003). Handbook of Discourse Analysis. In D. S. D. Tannen and H. Hamilton (eds.). Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 352-371). Oxford: Blackwell.
van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse and Manipulation. Discourse and Society, 17(2), 359-381.
Wutthichamnong, W. (2015). Other-repetition in Thai conversation. Master Thesis, Graduate school, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand. (In Thai)
Wutthichamnong, W. (2016). Pragmatic functions of “Okay” in Thai conversation. Journal of community development research (humanities and social sciences), 9(2), 115-127. (In Thai)