THE SANGAHAVATTHU IV DHAMMA PRINCIPLE FOR STRENGTHENING PARTICIPATION IN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

Authors

  • Benjawan Keawkhern 321 Prime Estate Co., Ltd

Keywords:

Sangahavatthu IV, Community Participation, Community Development

Abstract

This academic article aimed to examine the application of Sangahavatthu 4 in enhancing community participation in community development, consisting of Dana, giving, Piyavaca, pleasant speech, Atthacariya, beneficial conduct and Samanatattata, consistency, which are Buddhist principles focused on fostering positive relationships and social harmony. The study employed document analysis and theoretical examination of participation and community development concepts, along with an investigation of current challenges in creating community participation. The findings revealed that applying Sangahavatthu 4, Four Bases of Social Solidarity, can bridge the gap between leaders and communities, create a collaborative atmosphere, and strengthen mutual trust and confidence, leading to successful and sustainable community development. This study had significant implications for connecting traditional Thai wisdom with universal knowledge in community development, providing an appropriate approach for sustainable development within the Thai social context. The research contributed to both theoretical understanding and practical applications in community development, offering a culturally relevant framework that integrated Buddhist principles with contemporary development practices.

References

มหาจุฬาลงกรณราชวิทยาลัย. (2539). พระไตรปิฎกฉบับภาษาไทย ฉบับมหาจุฬาลงกรณราชวิทยาลัย. กรุงเทพฯ: โรงพิมพ์มหาจุฬาลงกรณราชวิทยาลัย.

Adedokun, M. O., & Adeyemo, C. W. (2010). The impact of communication on community development. International Journal of African Studies, 2(1), 45-58.

Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216-224.

Chambers, R. (2007). Rural Development: Putting the Last First. London: Routledge.

Christopher, J. C., & Hickinbottom, S. (2008). Positive Psychology, Ethnocentrism, and the Disguised Ideology of Individualism. Theory & Psychology, 18, 563-589. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354308093396

Cohen, J. M., & Uphoff, N. T. (1980). Participation's Place in Rural Development: Seeking Clarity Through Specificity. World Development, 8(3), 213-235.

Drahota, A., et al., (2020). Service deserts and service oases: Utilizing geographic information systems to evaluate service availability for individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Autism, 24(8), 2008-2020.

Fraser, H. (2005). Four Different Approaches to Community Participation. Community Development Journal, 40(3), 286-300.

Garabedian, J. J. (2005). Holistic Approach to Community Development. Paris: UNESCO.

Li, Q., et al., (2020). Knowledge structure of technology licensing based on co-keywords network: A review and future directions. International Review of Economics & Finance, 66(3), 154-165.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-26

How to Cite

Keawkhern, B. (2026). THE SANGAHAVATTHU IV DHAMMA PRINCIPLE FOR STRENGTHENING PARTICIPATION IN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. Academic Journal of Political Science and Public Administration, 8(1), 163–176. retrieved from https://so08.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/AJPP/article/view/4785