ADVANCEMENTS AND APPLICATIONS OF BLENDED LEARNING
Keywords:
advancements, applications, blended learningAbstract
Because it provides flexible, accessible, and individualized learning experiences that meet the needs of a wide range of learners, blended learning is essential to modern education. Blended learning combines traditional instruction with digital technologies, improves learning outcomes, encourages student engagement, and gives students the tools they need to succeed in the modern digital world. Therefore, this article was document research. Aims to offer a thorough summary of blended learning's developments and uses, illustrating how it has gone from being a cutting-edge experiment to a widely used teaching strategy. Because of its versatility, adaptability, and capacity to meet the needs of a wide range of learners, blended learning has become an essential component of modern education. Blended learning, which combines in-person and virtual learning, provides dynamic and interesting learning opportunities underpinned by pedagogical approaches, technological advancements, and theoretical frameworks. To fully realize the potential of blended learning and satisfy the changing demands of learners in the digital age, we must continue our research, innovate, and collaborate.
References
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Washington DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (Eds.). (2012). The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Christensen, C., & Horn, M. B. (2013). How do we transform our schools? In M. B. Horn & H. Staker (Eds.), Blended: Using disruptive innovation to improve schools (pp. 19-30). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Driscoll, M. (2002). Blended learning: Let's get beyond the hype. E-learning, 1(4), 1-4.
Dziuban, C., Hartman, J., & Moskal, P. (2004). Blended learning. EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research Bulletin, 7, 1-12.
Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95-105.
Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N.D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Graham, C. R., Woodfield, W., & Harrison, J. B. (2013). A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 18, 4-14.
Graham, C.R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C.J. Bonk & C.R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3-21). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Graham, C.R. (2019). The future of blended learning: Why blended learning will become the dominant model in education. New York: Routledge.
Graham, C. R., Woodfield, W., & Harrison, J.B. (2013). A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 18, 4-14.
Horn, M.B., & Staker, H. (2015). Blended: Using disruptive innovation to improve schools. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Jonassen, D.H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp. 215-239). New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Larmer, J., Mergendoller, J., & Boss, S. (2015). Setting the standard for project-based learning: A proven approach to rigorous classroom instruction. Virginia: ASCD.
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. US Department of Education.
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2013). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. US Department of Education.
Oliver, M., & Trigwell, K. (2005). Can ‘blended learning’ be redeemed? E-Learning, 2(1), 17-26.
Picciano, A.G. (2009). Blending with purpose: The multimodal model. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(1), 7-18.
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231.
Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1(1), 3-10.
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3-10.
Tucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom. Education Next, 12(1), 82-83.
Vaughan, N. D. (2014). Blended learning. In M. A. Peters (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory (pp. 1-5). New York: Springer.
Vaughan, N.D., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Garrison, D.R. (2013). Teaching in blended learning environments: Creating and sustaining communities of inquiry. Athabasca University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE SAKON NAKHON RAJABHAT UNIVERSITY

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
An article published in the Journal of Management Science. Sakon Nakhon Rajabhat University is the opinion, copyright and responsibility of the author of the work.