Supreme Administrative Court Decision No. A955/2555 Take Books into an Examination Room: Considered as Dishonest even if no Chance to Read
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14456/mfulj.2018.20Keywords:
Dishonest, Administrative Offence, Sanction AdministrativeAbstract
Decision of supreme administrative court No. A955/2555, Confirm and guarantee the legality of the decision of the university to give an F grade to students because they was considered as dishonest by taking text books in the examination room with no intent or no chance to read it. The decision was very clear and could be a stepping stone for these kind of cases. To support the decision, I design to use administrative offence and sanction administrative theory as tools to confirm a correctness of the decision.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
01.07.2018
How to Cite
Nachan, Natdanai. 2018. “Supreme Administrative Court Decision No. A955/2555 Take Books into an Examination Room: Considered as Dishonest even if no Chance to Read”. Mae Fah Luang University Law Journal 1 (2):87-98. https://doi.org/10.14456/mfulj.2018.20.
Issue
Section
Analysis of Judicial Decision
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Mae Fah Luang University Law Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.