Supreme Administrative Court Decision No. A955/2555 Take Books into an Examination Room: Considered as Dishonest even if no Chance to Read

Authors

  • Natdanai Nachan อาจารย์ประจำสาขากฎหมายมหาชน สำนักวิชานิติศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยแม่ฟ้าหลวง

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14456/mfulj.2018.20

Keywords:

Dishonest, Administrative Offence, Sanction Administrative

Abstract

Decision of supreme administrative court No. A955/2555, Confirm and guarantee the legality of the decision of the university to give an F grade to students because they was considered as dishonest by taking text books in the examination room with no intent or no chance to read it. The decision was very clear and could be a stepping stone for these kind of cases. To support the decision, I design to use administrative offence and sanction administrative theory as tools to confirm a correctness of the decision.

Downloads

Downloads

Published

01.07.2018

How to Cite

Nachan, Natdanai. 2018. “Supreme Administrative Court Decision No. A955/2555 Take Books into an Examination Room: Considered as Dishonest even if no Chance to Read”. Mae Fah Luang University Law Journal 1 (2):87-98. https://doi.org/10.14456/mfulj.2018.20.