Developing the Concept of Community Pets to align with Animal Rights Theories That Correspond with the Contemporary Lifestyles between Community Member and Stray Dog

Authors

  • Mutita Sarapat Ph.D. Candidate, Faculty of Law, Thammasat University

Keywords:

Animal Rights, Stray Dog, Community Pet

Abstract

         The perception of animals has undergone a significant transformation—from being regarded merely as living beings cohabiting the planet with humans, yet occupying an unequal status, to becoming subjects of shared societal agreements. This shift has been catalyzed by emerging scientific evidence demonstrating that many animal species possess sentience—the capacity to experience both positive and negative emotions—akin to that of humans. In Thailand, this evolving awareness has led to a profound change in how animals are viewed and treated. Historically, animals were considered property, with owners having unrestricted authority over their treatment. Today, legal frameworks mandate the provision of appropriate welfare for animals, prohibit abandonment without just cause, and forbid acts of cruelty. Violations of these laws are subject to legal penalties.
         This article analyzes the mentioned developments by examining the changing perception of animals, the emergence of animal rights and welfare theories, and the push for international agreements aimed at harmonizing animal protection standards. It also explores political theories on animal rights, which have evolved from foundational rights-based frameworks to incorporate the realities of human-animal coexistence. These theories emphasize the value of present-day relationships, including emotional interdependence, and align with the concept of well-being—an extension of the Five Freedoms principle. When applied to the management of stray dogs within communities, this framework supports the concept of the "community pet." It integrates humane population control measures such as capture, neutering, vaccination, and release, forming a new model known as CNVR-CP (Capture, Neuter, Vaccinate, Release – Community Pet). This model fosters sustained positive relationships between community members and stray dogs, facilitates ongoing vaccination efforts, and promotes a more compassionate public perception of stray animals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

จิรพงศ์ ทรัพย์ขุมทอง, การอ้างเหตุผลเพื่อสิทธิสัตว์ของทฤษฎีความเป็นพลเมืองในการต่อต้านทฤษฎีการเลิกทาส, (วิทยานิพนธ์ปริญญาโท หลักสูตรอักษรศาสตรมหาบัณฑิต จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย, 2561).

ปีเตอร์ ซิงเกอร์, Animal Liberation Now: ว่าด้วยจริยธรรมการปฏิบัติต่อสัตว์, (กรุงเทพมหานคร: สำนักพิมพ์สำนักนิสิตสามย่าน, 2567).

David Favre, An International Treaty for Animal Welfare, Animal Law Review, Volume 18 Issue 2 (2011-2012).

Erin Evans, Constitutional Inclusion of Animal Rights in Germany and Switzerland: How Did Animal Protection Become an Issue of National Importance? [Online], Source: https://www.animalsandsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/evans.pdf

Erwin Lengauer, Tom Regan’s Philosophy of Animal Rights: Subjects-of-a-Life in the Context of Discussions of Intrinsic and Inherent Worth [Online], Source: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340972300_Tom_Regan's_Philosophy_of_Animal_Rights_Subjects-of-a-Life_in_the_Context_of_Discussions_of_Intrinsic_and_Inherent_Worth

Justin E. H. Smith, Divine Machines: Leibniz and the Sciences of Life, (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011).

Martha C. Nussbaum, Justice for Animals: Our Collective Responsibility, (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2023).

Peter Harrison, Descartes on Animals, The Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 42 Issue 167 (April 1992).

Peter Harrison, The Virtues of Animals in Seventeenth-Century Thought, Journal of the History of Ideas, Volume 59 Issue 3 (July 1998).

Peter Singer, All Animals Are Equal in Animal Right, Edited by Clare Palmer, (London: Routledge, 2008).

ResearchGate, 77. The Use and Misuse of the Universal Declaration of Animal Rights in Portugal [Online], Source: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363216584_77_The_use_and_misuse_of_the_Universal_Declaration_of_Animal_Rights_in_Portugal

Richard H. Popkin, Apology for Raymond Sebond by Michel de Montaigne [Online], Source: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,sso&db=ers&AN=89876369&authtype=shib&site=eds-live&scope=site

Ryan Patrick McLaughlin, Non-Violence and Nonhumans: Foundations for Animal Welfare in the Thought of Mohandas Gandhi and Albert Schweitzer, Journal of Religion Ethic, Volume 40 Issue 4 (December 2012).

Scott Wilson, Indirect Duties to Animals, Journal of Value Inquiry, Volume 36 Issue 1 (March 2002).

Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Thomas Aquinas [Online], Source: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aquinas/#WillFree

Sue Donaldson and Will Kymlicka, Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights, (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011).

The Global Animal Law GAL Association, UN Convention on Animal Health and Protection (UNCAHP) [Online], Source: https://www.globalanimallaw.org/downloads/Folder-UNCAHP.pdf

Tom Ragan, The Case for Animal Rights in Animal Right, Edited by Clare Palmer, (London: Routledge, 2008).

World Society for the Protection of Animals, Universal Declaration on Animal Welfare [Online], Source: https://www.worldanimalprotection.ca/sites/default/files/media/ca_-_en_files/case_for_a_udaw_tcm22-8305.pdf

Downloads

Published

08.01.2026

How to Cite

Sarapat, Mutita. 2026. “Developing the Concept of Community Pets to align with Animal Rights Theories That Correspond with the Contemporary Lifestyles between Community Member and Stray Dog”. Mae Fah Luang University Law Journal 9 (1):128-52. https://so08.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/MFULJ/article/view/5332.