Digital Leadership of Administrators that Affects Teachers' Skills in the 21St Century in Educational Institutions, Krungthon Tai Group Office Bangkok

Main Article Content

Yasumin Ritmontree
Phrarajavajiranyanamethi

Abstract

This thesis aims to 1) study the digital leadership of school administrators in Krungthon Tai Group Office Bangkok, 2) study the 21st century skills of teachers in Krungthon Tai Group Office Bangkok, and 3) study the digital leadership of school administrators that affect the 21st century skills of teachers in Krungthon Tai Group Office Bangkok The sample group in this research is 60 schools in the Thonburi South Group, Bangkok, with a total of 341 respondents. The research instrument is a questionnaire. Data analysis is done using a ready-made program. The statistics used in data analysis are frequency, percentage, arithmetic mean, and standard deviation. The hypothesis testing uses multiple regression analysis The results of this research were as follows: 1. The digital leadership of school administrators in Krungthon Tai Group Office Bangkok, is at a high level overall. When considering each aspect, ranked from highest to lowest, they are systematic improvement, followed by culture creation, digital knowledge, digital citizenship, and digital vision. And the last rank is communication, respectively 2. The skills of teachers in the 21st century of educational institutions under the jurisdiction of Bangkok, Thonburi South Group, are overall at a high level. When considering each aspect, ranked from most to least, they are creativity, followed by morality, ethics, and professional law, knowledge, and finally teaching and learning management, measurement, and evaluation, respectively 3. The digital leadership of school administrators that affects the 21st century teacher skills of the Thonburi South Group, Bangkok, are: digital knowledge, systematic improvement, and digital citizenship, with statistical significance at the .05 level, with a multiple correlation coefficient (Multiple R) of .596, or 35.60 percent (R2=3.356), and the predictive equation can be written as follows: Forecast equations in raw score form 𝑌 â€ē = 1.117 + .138(X3) + .109(X5) + .336(X6) Forecast equations in standard score form 𝑍’ = .134(X3) + .111(X5) + .356(X6)

Article Details

How to Cite
Ritmontree, Y. ., & Phrarajavajiranyanamethi. (2025). Digital Leadership of Administrators that Affects Teachers’ Skills in the 21St Century in Educational Institutions, Krungthon Tai Group Office Bangkok. Journal of Dhamma for Life, 32(1), 275–290. retrieved from https://so08.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/dhammalife/article/view/5568
Section
Original Research Article

References

āļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļĢāļ§āļ‡āļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļ˜āļīāļāļēāļĢ. (2562). āļžāļĢāļ°āļĢāļēāļŠāļšāļąāļāļāļąāļ•āļīāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāđāļŦāđˆāļ‡āļŠāļēāļ•āļī āļž.āļĻ. 2562 āđāļĨāļ°āļ—āļĩāđˆāđāļāđ‰āđ„āļ‚āđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāđ€āļ•āļīāļĄ (āļ‰āļšāļąāļšāļ—āļĩāđˆ 4) āļž.āļĻ. 2562. āļāļĢāļļāļ‡āđ€āļ—āļžāļŊ: āļœāļđāđ‰āđāļ•āđˆāļ‡.

āđ€āļ‰āļĨāļīāļĄāļžāļĨ āļ§āļ‡āļĻāđŒāļžāļĢāļ°āļĨāļąāļš, āđāļĨāļ°āļ§āļēāļ™āļīāļŠ āļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļŠāļĢāļīāļāļžāļĢ. (2564). āļ āļēāļ§āļ°āļœāļđāđ‰āļ™āļģāļ”āļīāļˆāļīāļ—āļąāļĨāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļœāļđāđ‰āļšāļĢāļīāļŦāļēāļĢāļŠāļ–āļēāļ™āļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāđƒāļ™āļĻāļ•āļ§āļĢāļĢāļĐāļ—āļĩāđˆ 21 āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļŠāļ–āļēāļ™āļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāđƒāļ™āļŠāļąāļ‡āļāļąāļ”āļ­āļēāļŠāļĩāļ§āļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļˆāļąāļ‡āļŦāļ§āļąāļ”āļ‚āļ­āļ™āđāļāđˆāļ™. āļ§āļēāļĢāļŠāļēāļĢāļāļēāļĢāļšāļĢāļīāļŦāļēāļĢāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļē, 12(2), 45–60.

āļ˜āļąāļāļŠāļēāļ•āļī āļĨāđ‰āļ­āļžāļ‡āļĻāđŒāļžāļēāļ™āļīāļŠāļĒāđŒ. (2565). āļ āļēāļ§āļ°āļœāļđāđ‰āļ™āļģāļĒāļļāļ„āļ”āļīāļˆāļīāļ—āļąāļĨāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļœāļđāđ‰āļšāļĢāļīāļŦāļēāļĢāļŠāļ–āļēāļ™āļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāđˆāļ‡āļœāļĨāļ•āđˆāļ­āļŠāļĄāļĢāļĢāļ–āļ™āļ°āļ”āđ‰āļēāļ™āđ€āļ—āļ„āđ‚āļ™āđ‚āļĨāļĒāļĩāļŠāļēāļĢāļŠāļ™āđ€āļ—āļĻāđƒāļ™āļĻāļ•āļ§āļĢāļĢāļĐāļ—āļĩāđˆ 21 āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ„āļĢāļđāđ‚āļĢāļ‡āđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āđ€āļ­āļāļŠāļ™ āļˆāļąāļ‡āļŦāļ§āļąāļ”āļ­āļļāļšāļĨāļĢāļēāļŠāļ˜āļēāļ™āļĩ. āļ§āļīāļ—āļĒāļēāļ™āļīāļžāļ™āļ˜āđŒāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļĻāļēāļŠāļ•āļĢāļĄāļŦāļēāļšāļąāļ“āļ‘āļīāļ•, āļĄāļŦāļēāļ§āļīāļ—āļĒāļēāļĨāļąāļĒāļĢāļēāļŠāļ āļąāļāļ­āļļāļšāļĨāļĢāļēāļŠāļ˜āļēāļ™āļĩ.

āļ˜āļąāļāļāļēāļ āļĢāļ“āđŒ āļ™āļēāļˆāļģāļ›āļē. (2564). āļšāļ—āļšāļēāļ—āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļœāļđāđ‰āļšāļĢāļīāļŦāļēāļĢāļŠāļ–āļēāļ™āļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļŠāđˆāļ‡āđ€āļŠāļĢāļīāļĄāļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰āđ€āļ—āļ„āđ‚āļ™āđ‚āļĨāļĒāļĩāļ”āļīāļˆāļīāļ—āļąāļĨāđƒāļ™āļŠāļ–āļēāļ™āļĻāļķāļāļĐāļē. āļ§āļēāļĢāļŠāļēāļĢāļāļēāļĢāļšāļĢāļīāļŦāļēāļĢāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļē, 15(2), 45–60.

āļšāļļāļāļŠāļĄ āļĻāļĢāļĩāļŠāļ°āļ­āļēāļ”. (2556). āļāļēāļĢāļ§āļīāļˆāļąāļĒāđ€āļšāļ·āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āļ•āđ‰āļ™ (āļžāļīāļĄāļžāđŒāļ„āļĢāļąāđ‰āļ‡āļ—āļĩāđˆ 9). āļāļĢāļļāļ‡āđ€āļ—āļžāļŊ: āļŠāļļāļ§āļĩāļĢāļīāļĒāļēāļŠāļēāļŠāđŒāļ™.

āļ āļąāļ—āļĢāļē āļˆāļĢāļĢāļĒāļēāļ˜āļĢāļĢāļĄ. (2564). āļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļĢāļ°āļšāļšāļŠāļēāļĢāļŠāļ™āđ€āļ—āļĻāđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āļāļēāļĢāļšāļĢāļīāļŦāļēāļĢāļŠāļ–āļēāļ™āļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāđƒāļ™āļĒāļļāļ„āļ”āļīāļˆāļīāļ—āļąāļĨ. āļ§āļēāļĢāļŠāļēāļĢāļ§āļīāļŠāļēāļāļēāļĢāļ„āļĢāļļāļĻāļēāļŠāļ•āļĢāđŒ, 18(1), 89–104.

āļĢāļļāđˆāļ‡āļĢāļąāļ•āļ™āđŒ āļžāļĨāļŠāļąāļĒ. (2563). āļ āļēāļ§āļ°āļœāļđāđ‰āļ™āļģāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļœāļđāđ‰āļšāļĢāļīāļŦāļēāļĢāļŠāļ–āļēāļ™āļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāđƒāļ™āļĒāļļāļ„āļ”āļīāļˆāļīāļ—āļąāļĨ. āļāļĢāļļāļ‡āđ€āļ—āļžāļŊ: āļŠāļģāļ™āļąāļāļžāļīāļĄāļžāđŒāđāļŦāđˆāļ‡āļˆāļļāļŽāļēāļĨāļ‡āļāļĢāļ“āđŒāļĄāļŦāļēāļ§āļīāļ—āļĒāļēāļĨāļąāļĒ.

āļŠāļģāļ™āļąāļāļ‡āļēāļ™āļ„āļ“āļ°āļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļāļēāļĢāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļ‚āļąāđ‰āļ™āļžāļ·āđ‰āļ™āļāļēāļ™. (2553). āļĢāļēāļĒāļ‡āļēāļ™āļœāļĨāļāļēāļĢāļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļĄāļīāļ™āļŠāļĄāļĢāļĢāļ–āļ™āļ°āļ”āđ‰āļēāļ™āđ€āļ—āļ„āđ‚āļ™āđ‚āļĨāļĒāļĩāļŠāļēāļĢāļŠāļ™āđ€āļ—āļĻāđāļĨāļ°āļāļēāļĢāļŠāļ·āđˆāļ­āļŠāļēāļĢ (ICT) āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ„āļĢāļđāđāļĨāļ°āļœāļđāđ‰āļšāļĢāļīāļŦāļēāļĢāļŠāļ–āļēāļ™āļĻāļķāļāļĐāļē. āļāļĢāļļāļ‡āđ€āļ—āļžāļŊ: āļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļĢāļ§āļ‡āļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļ˜āļīāļāļēāļĢ.

āļŠāļģāļ™āļąāļāļ‡āļēāļ™āļŠāļ āļēāļžāļąāļ’āļ™āļēāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĻāļĢāļĐāļāļāļīāļˆāđāļĨāļ°āļŠāļąāļ‡āļ„āļĄāđāļŦāđˆāļ‡āļŠāļēāļ•āļī. (2561). āđāļœāļ™āļžāļąāļ’āļ™āļēāđ€āļĻāļĢāļĐāļāļāļīāļˆāđāļĨāļ°āļŠāļąāļ‡āļ„āļĄāđāļŦāđˆāļ‡āļŠāļēāļ•āļī āļ‰āļšāļąāļšāļ—āļĩāđˆ 12 (āļž.āļĻ. 2560–2564). āļāļĢāļļāļ‡āđ€āļ—āļžāļŊ: āļœāļđāđ‰āđāļ•āđˆāļ‡.

Avolio, B. J. (2014). Leadership in the digital age. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Donna Marie Fisher, & Waller, L. R. (2014). Technology leadership and teacher technology integration: A correlational study. Journal of Educational Administration, 52(6), 735–756.

Gurr, D. (2016). A model of successful school leadership from the International Successful School Principalship Project. Societies, 6(1), 1–15.

IDC & Workday. (2022). Asia/Pacific digital readiness survey report. Singapore: IDC Asia/Pacific.

Ismail, R., Don, Y., Husin, F., & Khalid, R. (2021). Technology leadership and teachers’ ICT competency: The mediating role of digital citizenship. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(4), 806–824.

Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

Mrazek, R. (2022). Educational leadership in the digital age. New York: Routledge.

Ng, W. (2015). New digital technology in education: Conceptualizing professional learning for educators. Educational Technology & Society, 18(2), 167–179.

Pellegrino, J. W., & Hilton, M. L. (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Spiteri, M., & Chang Rundgren, S. N. (2020). Literature review on the factors affecting primary teachers’ use of digital technology. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 29(1), 115–128.

Thannimalai, R. (2018). The influence of principals’ technology leadership on teachers’ technology integration in Malaysian secondary schools. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(12), 1206–1221.

Voogt, J., Erstad, O., Dede, C., & Mishra, P. (2015). Challenges to learning and schooling in the digital networked world of the 21st century. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(5), 403–413.