Revisiting the Geography of Globalisation in the Covid-19 Pandemic using Risk Theory

ผู้แต่ง

  • Kunphatu Sakwit Institute of Asian Studies and Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Faculty of Political Science, Chulalongkorn University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61462/cujss.v53i1.1275

คำสำคัญ:

Geography, Globalisation, Ulrich Beck, Risk Society, Knowledge Production

บทคัดย่อ

My review paper is part of Covid-IAS Project, funded by National Research Council of Thailand. The paper focuses on the geography of globalisation in the Covid -19 pandemic. I employ Ulrich Beck’s concept of risk society to critically examine geography. Although Beck is not a geography theorist, his theory can be used extensively and alternatively to study the geography of globalisation. By drawing upon Beck, I argue that the geography of globalisation in the context of Covid -19 displays forms of dependency upon the politics of knowledge about Covid -19 vaccines. With the production of knowledge, the vaccines have caused various forms of dependency, including global dependency (external knowledge about the effectiveness of the vaccines and their side-effects), regional dependency and international dependency (the EU and its member states), the interplay between global dependency and international dependency (COVAX), and the emergence of the nation states as regional production hubs (AstraZeneca vaccine). Although Beck’s theory enables us to critically investigate the geography of globalisation, Beck ignores the significance of the nation states in globalised risk situation. In contrast with Beck, I suggest that nation states have still played important roles in world risk society, especially in the context of Covid -19.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AstraZeneca. 2021. “Pushing Boundaries to Deliver COVID-19 Vaccine across the Globe.” 2021. accessed June 19, 2021. https://www.astrazeneca.com/what-science-can-do/topics/technologies/pushing-boundaries-to-deliver-covid-19-vaccine-accross-the-globe.html.

Bangkok Post. 2021. “AstraZeneca Says ‘Working’ with SE Asian Nations on Vaccine Deliveries.” Bangkok Post, June 10, 2021. accessed June 10, 2021. https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/general/2130135/astrazeneca-says-working-with-se-asian-nations-on-vaccine-deliveries.

BBC. 2021a. “Coronavirus: Setback for EU in Legal Fight with AstraZeneca.” BBC News, 2021, sec. Europe. accessed June 18, 2021. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-57531064.

BBC. 2021b. “Covax: How Many Covid Vaccines Have the US and the Other G7 Countries Pledged?” BBC News, 2021, sec. World. accessed September 23, 2021. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-55795297.

BBC. 2021c. “Covid: What Is Happening with the EU Vaccine Rollout?” BBC News, 2021, sec. Explainers. accessed June 21, 2021. https://www.bbc.com/news/explainers-52380823.

Beck, Ulrich. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. 1st edition. London; Newbury Park, Calif: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Beck, Ulrich. 2002. “The Cosmopolitan Society and Its Enemies.” Theory, Culture & Society 19 (1–2): 17–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327640201900101.

Brenner, Neil. 1999. “Beyond State-Centrism? Space, Territoriality, and Geographical Scale in Globalization Studies.” Theory and Society 28(1): 39–78. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006996806674.

Castells, Manuel. 1999. “Grassrooting the Space of Flows.” Urban Geography 20 (4): 294–302. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.20.4.294.

Connolly, Kevin. 2021. “Sputnik V: How Russia’s Covid Vaccine Is Dividing Europe.” BBC News, April 17, 2021, sec. Europe. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-56735931.

Enderwick, Peter, and Peter J. Buckley. 2020. “Rising Regionalization: Will the Post-COVID-19 World See a Retreat from Globalization.” Transnational Corporations 27(2), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.18356/8008753a-en.

Giddens, Anthony. 2002. Runaway World: How Globalization Is Reshaping Our Lives. 1st edition. New York, NY: Routledge.

Harvey, David. 2001. “Globalization and the ‘Spatial Fix.’” Geographische Revue : Zeitschrift Für Literatur Und Diskussion 3(2), 23–30.

McCann, Philip. 2008. “Globalization and Economic Geography: The World Is Curved, Not Flat.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 1(3): 351–70. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsn002.

Robertson, Roland. 1994. “Globalisation or Glocalisation?” The Journal of International Communication 1(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/13216597.1994.9751780.

Sassen, Saskia. 2003. “Globalization or Denationalization?” Review of International Political Economy 10 (1): 1–22.

Sforza, Alessandro, and Marina Steininger. 2020. “Globalization in the Time of Covid-19.” CESifo Working Paper No. 8184. Munich: Center for Economic Studies and ifo Institute (CESifo). accessed May 25, 2021. https://www.cesifo.org/en/publications/2020/working-paper/globalization-time-covid-19.

Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1975. “Preface: The Present State of the Debate on World Inequality.” In World Inequality: Origins and Perspectives on the World System, edited by Immanuel Wallerstein. Montreal: Black Rose Books Ltd.

Wallerstein, Immanuel. 2004. World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction. Durham: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11smzx1.

WHO. 2021a. “COVAX Working for Global Equitable Access to COVID-19 Vaccines.” 2021. accessed June 19, 2021. https://www.who.int/initiatives/act-accelerator/covax.

WHO. 2021b. “Side Effects of COVID-19 Vaccines.” March 31, 2021. https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/side-effects-of-covid-19-vaccines.

WHO. 2021c. “Background Document on the Inactivated COVID-19 Vaccine BIBP Developed by China National Biotec Group (‎CNBG)‎, Sinopharm.” May 7, 2021. https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/WHO-2019-nCoV-vaccines-SAGE_recommendation-BIBP-background-2021.1.

WHO. 2021d. “WHO Lists Additional COVID-19 Vaccine for Emergency Use and Issues Interim Policy Recommendations.” May 7, 2021. https://www.who.int/news/item/07-05-2021-who-lists-additional-covid-19-vaccine-for-emergency-use-and-issues-interim-policy-recommendations.

WHO. 2021e. “Interim Recommendations for Use of the Moderna MRNA-1273 Vaccine against Covid-19.” June 15, 2021. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/interim-recommendations-for-use-of-the-moderna-mrna-1273-vaccine-against-covid-19.

WHO. 2021f. “Interim Recommendations for Use of the Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, BNT162b2, under Emergency Use Listing.” June 15, 2021. https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/WHO-2019-nCoV-vaccines-SAGE_recommendation-BNT162b2-2021.1.

WHO. 2021g. “Interim Recommendations for Use of the ChAdOx1-S [Recombinant] Vaccine against COVID-19 (AstraZeneca COVID-19 Vaccine AZD1222 VaxzevriaTM, SII COVISHIELDTM).” July 30, 2021. accessed June 14, 2023. https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/WHO-2019-nCoV-vaccines-SAGE_recommendation-AZD1222-2021.1.

Wimmer, Jeffrey, and Thorsten Quandt. 2006. “Living in the Risk Society.” Journalism Studies 7(2), 336–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700600645461.

Downloads

เผยแพร่แล้ว

15-06-2023

How to Cite

Sakwit, Kunphatu. 2023. “Revisiting the Geography of Globalisation in the Covid-19 Pandemic Using Risk Theory”. วารสารสังคมศาสตร์ จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย 53 (1). Bangkok, Thailand:1-17. https://doi.org/10.61462/cujss.v53i1.1275.