Providing Welfare to Enhance Media Literacy and Promote Digital Justice for the Elderly

Authors

  • Benjarat Sutjakul ์Department of General Education, Faculty of Sciences and Health Technology, Navamindradhiraj University
  • Suteera Saenmontrikul Department of General Education, Faculty of Sciences and Health Technology, Navamindradhiraj University
  • Penchan Pradubmook Sherer Department of Social and Health, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Mahidol University
  • Kosin Theswong Urban Community Development Collage, Navamindradhiraj University
  • Benjaporn Pudsa Independent Scholar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61462/cujss.v55i1.3969

Keywords:

Welfare, Media Literacy, Digital Justice, Elderly

Abstract

Digital justice is a topic that has not been widely discussed in Thailand, despite being a key factor contributing to social inequality, particularly in terms of access to information, services, and basic social welfare that all citizens should rightfully receive. Social inequality is often framed primarily in terms of economic and societal disparities, with limited attention to “digital justice in media and technology.” This oversight indicates a gap in academic research, particularly in ensuring fair welfare for all, including the elderly, who are the focus of this article. This study seeks to expand perspectives on aging and challenge ageist stereotypes that portray older adults as resistant to technology. Findings from our research indicate a different reality: many elderly individuals actively acquire digital skills to stay informed and engaged in an evolving world. However, a portion of the elderly population still lacks digital proficiency, which limits their participation in society and restricts access to governmental information and services. This article outlines guidelines for welfare programs aimed at enhancing media literacy and promoting digital justice for the elderly, with objectives to reduce age discrimination, broaden social inclusion, and protect the rights of older adults in both the physical and virtual world. These issues are examined through the frameworks of social justice, digital justice, and digital human rights.

Downloads

References

Alexopoulou, Sofia, Joachim Åström, and Martin Karlsson. 2022. “The grey digital divide and welfare state regimes: A comparative study of European countries.” Information Technology & People 35 (8): 273–291. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-11-2020-0803.

Benjarat Sutjakul, Kosin Theswong, Benjaporn Pudsa, and Suteera Saenmontrikul. 2023. Research and Development of Active Ageing and the Elderly’s Roles on Using Social Media Safely, Creatively, and Knowledgeably. Bangkok: Thailand Science Research and Innovation. (in Thai)

Chatchai Muksong and Nopporn Malarak. 2024 “Digital Divide.” Accessed August 8, 2024. https://wiki.kpi.ac.th/index.php?title=ช่องว่างทางดิจิทัล_(Digital_Divide). (in Thai)

Faverio, Michelle. 2022. “Share of those 65 and older who are tech users has grown in the past decade.” Accessed January 13, 2022. https://www.pewresearch.org/shortreads/2022/01/13/share-of-those-65-and-older-who-are-tech-users-has-grown-in-the-past-decade.

Grizzle, Alton, Penny Moore, Michael Dezuanni, et al. 2014. Media and Information Literacy: Policy and Strategy Guidelines. Paris: UNESCO.

Montakarn Chimmamee, Chonticha Asavanirandorn, and Thananon Buathong. 2024. “Development and Enhancement of Work Skills among Thai Older Adults: Challenges and Future Policy Directions.” Aging Focus 1 (2): 8–11. https://thaitgri.org/?wpdmpro=aging-focus-จับตาสถานการณ์ผู้สูงอายุ. (in Thai)

National Statistical Office. 2022. “The 2022 Household Survey on the Use of Information and Communication Technology (Quarter 2).” Accessed November 10, 2024.https://www.nso.go.th/nsoweb/storage/survey_detail/2023/20230430130946_84978.pdf. (in Thai)

National Statistical Office. 2023. Summary of Important Results: Survey on the Use of Information and Communication Technology in Households 2023. Ministry of Digital Economy and Society.https://www.nso.go.th/nsoweb/storage/survey_detail/2024/20240426085831_43202.pdf. (in Thai)

Niran Jongwutthiwet. 2007. Community Development Concepts. Bangkok: Ruam Thai Press. Community Development Department, Ministry of Interior. (in Thai)

Office of the National Digital Economy and Society Commission. 2019. “National Policy and Plan on Digital Development for the Economy and Society (2018–2037).” Accessed November 10, 2024.https://onde.go.th/assets/portals/1/files/620425-Government%20Gazette.PDF. (in Thai)

Prins, Corien. 2018. “Digital justice.” Computer Law & Security Review 34 (4): 920–923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.05.024.

Schafer, Stephen. 1977. Victimology: The Victim and His Criminal. Reston Publishing Company.

Van Dijk, Jan. 2005. The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452229812.

Van Dijk, Jan. 2020. “The Digital Divide.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 72 (1): 136–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24355.

World Economic Forum. 2021. “Pathways to Digital Justice.” Accessed August 28, 2024. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Pathways_to_Digital_Justice_2021.pdf.

World Economic Forum. 2023. “Future of Jobs Report 2023.” Accessed September 2, 2024. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs_2023.pdf.

Downloads

Published

16-06-2025

How to Cite

Sutjakul, Benjarat, Suteera Saenmontrikul, Penchan Sherer, Kosin Theswong, and Benjaporn Pudsa. 2025. “Providing Welfare to Enhance Media Literacy and Promote Digital Justice for the Elderly”. Chulalongkorn University Journal of Social Sciences 55 (1). Bangkok, Thailand:115-39. https://doi.org/10.61462/cujss.v55i1.3969.

Issue

Section

Research Articles