เงื่อนไขไตรลักษณ์ของความรุนแรงที่กระทำโดยรัฐต่อมุสลิมชนกลุ่มน้อย: ศึกษาเทียบเคียงกรณีโรฮีนจาในรัฐยะไข่ของเมียนมากับกรณีมลายูมุสลิมในจังหวัดชายแดนใต้ของไทย
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61462/cujss.v52i2.910บทคัดย่อ
งานวิจัยชิ้นนี้ศึกษาความแตกต่างของความสัมพันธ์ระหว่างรัฐกับมุสลิมชนกลุ่มน้อยในประเทศเมียนมาและไทย โดยใช้กรณีของโรฮีนจาในรัฐยะไข่เทียบเคียงกับกรณีของมลายูมุสลิมในจังหวัดชายแดนใต้ แม้ว่าเมียนมาและไทยเป็นประเทศที่มีผู้นับถือศาสนาพุทธนิกายเถรวาทเป็นชนส่วนใหญ่ แต่ผลลัพธ์ของความสัมพันธ์ระหว่างรัฐและมุสลิมชนกลุ่มน้อยของทั้งสองประเทศก็มีความแตกต่างกันอย่างชัดเจน กล่าวคือ ในกรณีของโรฮีนจาปรากฏความรุนแรงสุดโต่ง ส่วนในกรณีของมลายูมุสลิมเกิดความรุนแรงต่ำที่กระทำโดยรัฐ นัยยะของการเทียบเคียงของทั้งสองกรณีคือการค้นหาปัจจัยที่ทำให้เกิดและไม่เกิดความรุนแรงที่กระทำโดยรัฐต่อชนกลุ่มน้อยมุสลิม ผลการศึกษาพบว่าปัจจัยสำคัญที่ทำให้ทั้งสองกรณีแตกต่างกันคือ ‘เงื่อนไขไตรลักษณ์’ ซึ่งประกอบด้วยมุมมองของรัฐต่อมุสลิมชนกลุ่มน้อย อิทธิพลของขบวนการพุทธชาตินิยม และความอ่อนแอของมุสลิมชนกลุ่มน้อย ฉะนั้น เมื่อรัฐมีมุมมองที่ปิดกั้นต่อชนกลุ่มน้อยประกอบกับขบวนการพุทธชาตินิยมมีอิทธิพลสูงและสถานะของมุสลิมชนกลุ่มน้อยมีความอ่อนแอแล้ว โอกาสที่จะเกิดการใช้ความรุนแรงสุดโต่งก็มีสูงตามไปด้วย ด้วยเหตุนี้ ผู้วิจัยเสนอว่าการปรากฏหรือไม่ปรากฏของเงื่อนไขไตรลักษณ์สามารถใช้เป็นเครื่องมือในการเฝ้าระวังการใช้ความรุนแรงสุดโต่งที่กระทำโดยรัฐต่อมลายูมุสลิมในประเทศไทย และต่อชนกลุ่มน้อยทางศาสนาและชาติพันธุ์ในเอเชียตะวันออกเฉียงใต้
Downloads
References
Administrative Office of the Court of Justice, Region IV. 2017. “Krop Adtra Kamlang Khong Kharatchakan Fai Tulakan Sanyutitham Lae Bukhlakon Praphet Tang Tang Samrap Khrongkan Phoem Sakkayaphap Kharatchakan Fai Tulakan Sanyutitham Thi San Lae Phak Damnoenkan.” [Manpower Framework of Judicial Civil Servants and Other Officers for Project to Empower Judicial Civil Servants at the Courts and the Operation Sector]. Khon Kean: Administrative Office of the Court of Justice, Region IV. Accessed October 15, 2020. https://jor4.coj.go.th/th/file/get/file/ 201809261e46d620479688be232e6f9c0b2e34fd065631.pdf. (in Thai)
AFP. 2020. “Rohingya Muslim Barred from Contesting Myanmar’s Upcoming Election.” The News, August 12. Accessed December 14, 2020. https://www.thenews.com.pk/latest/699606-rohingya-muslim-barred-from-con-myantesting- mars-upcoming-election.
Al Jazeera Media Network. 2017. “Myanmar Army Chief Rules Out Rohingya Citizenship.” Al Jazeera, March 27. Accessed August 10, 2019. https://www.aljazeera.com/videos/2017/03/27/myanmar-army-chief-rules-out-rohingya-citizenship.
Amnesty International. 2017a. “‘Caged without a Roof’: Apartheid in Myanmar’s Rakhine State.” London: Amnesty International. Accessed June 10, 2020. https://www.amnesty.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/ ASA1674842017ENGLISH.pdf.
-----. 2017b. “‘My World Is Finished’: Rohingya Targeted in Crimes against Humanity in Myanmar.” London: Amnesty International. Accessed March 12, 2020. https://www.amnestyusa.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Amnesty-My-World-Is-Finished-Myanmar-18.10.20171.pdf.
-----. 2019. “Myanmar: ‘No One Can Protect Us’: War Crimes and Abuses in Myanmar’s Rakhine State.” London: Amnesty International. Accessed February 13, 2020. https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/document/?indexNumber=asa16% 2f0417%2f2019&language=en.
-----. 2016. “‘We Are at Breaking Point’-Rohingya: Persecuted in Myanmar, Neglected in Bangladesh.” London: Amnesty International. Accessed August 15, 2020. https://www.amnesty.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/ ASA1653622016ENGLISH.pdf.
-----. 2018. “‘We Will Destroy Everything’: Military Responsibility for Crimes against Humanity in Rakhine State, Myanmar.” Accessed February 13, 2020. London: Amnesty International. https://www.amnesty.org/en/wp-content/ uploads/2021/05/ASA1686302018ENGLISH.pdf.
Andrews, Tom, David Baulk, Matthew Smith, Amy Smith, and Daniel Sullivan. 2016. Supporting Human Rights in Myanmar: Why the U.S. Should Maintain Existing Sanctions Authority. [Southeast Asia]: Fortify Rights; Washington, DC: United to End Genocide. Accessed July 3, 2021. https://www.fortifyrights.org/downloads/Fortify%20Rights%20&% 20UEG,%20Supporting% 20Human%20Rights%20in%20Myanmar%20(May%202016).pdf.
Anekchai Rueangrattanakorn. 2015. “Botbat Khong Udomkan ‘Phutthasatsana-Chatniyom Suttong’ Kap Khwam Khatyaeng Rawang Chao Phutthaya Khai Kap Chao Muslim Rohingya.” [The Role of Ultra-Buddhist Nationalism and the Conflicts between Buddhists in Rakhine State and Muslim.
Bauchner. Shayna. 2020. “Myanmar Bars Rohingya Candidates from Elections, Again: Politicians Persist Despite Violence, Persecution against Muslim Minority.” Human Rights Watch, August 18. Accessed December 15, 2020. https://www.hrw.org/news/2020/08/18/myanmar-bars-rohingya-candidates-elections-again.
Bryman, Alan. 2012. Social Research Methods. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Central Intelligence Agency. 2019. “The World Factbook.” Accessed January 25, 2020. https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook.
Chaiwat Satha-Anand. 2016. “Kamnum Bannatikan.” [The Editor’s Preface]. In Phuenthi Santi Withi Honthang Sangkhom Thai: Khwamru Khwam Lap Khwam Song Cham. [Nonviolent Space and Thailand’s Road: Knowledge, Secrets, Memories], edited by Chaiwat Satha-Anand. Bangkok: Protestista. (in Thai)
Chaiwat Satha-Anand, Somkiat Boonchu, Chantana Banphasirichot Wankaew, Chalidaporn Songsampham et al. 2018. Santi Sontana: Sentang Pachean Khwam Runrang Chaidantai, 2534-2554. [Peace Dialogue: Confronting Violence in Southern Border Provinces, 1991-2011]. Bangkok: The Thailand Research Fund (TRF). (in Thai)
Channarong Bunnoon. 2019. “Kho Thokthiang Rueang Phutthasatsana Pracham Chatthai Nai Ratthathammanun: Bot Wikhro Lae Khosangket.” [Debate on Buddhism as National Religion in the Constitution: Analysis and Observations]. In Satsana Kap Khwam Runraeng. [Religion and Violence], edited by Pridi Hongsaton and Amporn Marddent, 400-459. Bangkok: Illuminations Editions; Patani Forum. (in Thai)
Crouch, Melissa. 2016. “Personal Law and Colonial Legacy: State-Religion Relations and Islamic Law in Myanmar.” In Islam and the State in Myanmar: Muslim-Buddhist Relations and the Politics of Belonging, edited by Melissa Crouch. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Danai Musa. 2016. “Santi Withi Nai Miti Ngan Khwam Mankhong Thai.” [Nonviolence in Thailand’s National Security Operations Dimension]. In Phuenthi Santi Withi Honthang Sangkhom Thai: Khwamru Khwam Lap Khwam Song Cham. [Nonviolent Space and Thailand’s Road: Knowledge, Secrets, Memories], edited by Chaiwat Satha-Anand. Bangkok: Protestista. (in Thai)
Deep South Watch. 2020. “Sarup Hetkan Nai Phuenthi Changwat Chaidaen Phaktai Prachamduean Kanyayon 2563.” [Summary of Incidents in Southern Border Provinces, September 2020]. Deep South Watch, October 9. Accessed October 13, 2020. https://deepsouthwatch.org/th/node/11964. (in Thai)
Don Pathan, Ekkarin Tuansiri, and Anwar Koma. 2018. Understanding Anti-Islam Sentiment in Thailand. Translated by Pipob Udomittipong. Pattani: Patani Forum.
Dulyapak Preecharush. 2015. Rohingya: Rat Chattiphan Prawattisat Lae Khwam Khatyaeng. [Rohingya: State, Ethnicities, History, and Conflict]. Bangkok: Matichon. (in Thai)
Ekkarin Tuansiri. 2013. “Mahroso Chantawadi: Chak Yuea Su Kaennam RKK.” [Mahroso Chatrawadi: From Victim to Leader of RKK]. Prachatai, February 15. Accessed October 12, 2020. https://prachatai.com/journal/2013/02/45315. (in Thai)
Ekkarin Tuansiri, and Anwar Koma. 2020. “A Fragile Society: Buddhist-Muslims Relations in Thailand in 2018-2019.” Walailak Journal of Social Science 13(1): 104-144.
-----. 2019. “Krasae Watklua Isalam Nai Prathet Thai: Khosangket Bueangton.” [Islamophobia in Thailand: A Preliminary Observation]. In Satsana Kap Khwam Runraeng. [Religion and Violence], edited by Pridi Hongsaton and Amporn Marddent, 364-98. Bangkok: Illuminations Editions; Patani Forum. (in Thai)
Fortify Rights. 2020a. “Myanmar: Prevent Exclusion of Rohingya Candidates from National Elections.” Fortify Rights, August 19. Accessed November 4, 2020. https://www.fortifyrights.org/mya-inv-2020-08-19.
-----. 2020b. “Myanmar: Reverse Decision to Bar Rohingya from Elections.” Fortify Rights, August 31. Accessed November 5, 2020. https://www.fortifyrights.org/mya-inv-2020-08-31.
-----. 2017. “They Tried to Kill Us All”: Atrocity Crimes against Rohingya Muslims in Rakhine State, Myanmar. Washington, DC: Simon-SKJODT Center for the Prevention of Genocide, United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Southeast Asia: Fortify Rights. Accessed July 13, 2021. https://www.ushmm.org/m/pdfs/201711-atrocity-crimes-rohingya-muslims.pdf.
Fortify Rights and Burmese Rohingya Organization UK (BROUK). 2016. Everywhere Is Trouble: An Update on the Situation of Rohingya Refugees in Thailand, Malaysia, and Indonesia. 2016. [Southeast Asia]: Fortify Rights; [London]: Burmese Rohingya Organization UK (BROUK). Accessed January 12, 2020. https://www.fortifyrights.org/downloads/ EverywhereisTrouble.pdf.
Global New Light of Myanmar. 2017. “All Myanmar Islamic Religious Organization Strongly Condemns ARSA Terrorist Group, Urges Muslims to Cooperate with Authorities Concerned for Peace and Stability.” The Global New Light of Myanmar, September 11. Accessed December 15, 2019. https://www.gnlm.com.mm/myanmar-islamic-religious-organization-strongly-condemns-arsa-terrorist-group-urges-muslims-cooperate-authorities-concerned-peace-stability.
Human Rights Watch. 2017a. “‘All of My Body Was Pain’:Sexual Violence against Rohingya Women and Girls in Burma.” Human Rights Watch, November 16. Accessed January 20, 2020. https://www.hrw.org/report/2017/11/16/all-my-body-was-pain/sexual-violence-against-rohingya-women-and-girls-burma.
-----. 2013. “‘All You Can Do Is Pray’: Crimes Against Humanity and Ethnic Cleansing of Rohingya Muslims in Burma’s Arakan State.” Human Rights Watch, April 22. Accessed January 12, 2020. https://www.hrw.org/report/2013/04/22/all-you-can-do-pray/crimes-against-humanity-and-ethnic-cleansing-rohingya-muslims.
-----. 2017b. “Burma: Satellite Imagery Shows Mass Destruction: 214 Villages Almost Totally Destroyed in Rakhine States.” Human Rights Watch, September 19. Accessed January 20, 2020. https://www.hrw.org/news/2017/09/19/ burma-satellite-imagery-shows-mass-destruction.
-----. 2012. “‘The Government Could Have Stopped This’: Sectarian Violence and Ensuing Abuses in Burma’s Arakan State.” Human Rights Watch, July 31. Accessed January 12, 2020. https://www.hrw.org/report/2012/07/31/government-could-have-stopped/sectarian-violence-and-ensuing-abuses-burmas-arakan.
International Crisis Group. 2017a. Buddhism and State Power in Myanmar. Brussels: International Crisis Group. Accessed March 12, 2020. https://d2071andvip0wj.cloudfront.net/290-buddhism-and-state-power-in-myanmar.pdf.
-----. 2013. The Dark Side of Transition: Violence against Muslims in Myanmar. Brussels: International Crisis Group. Accessed February 13, 2013. https://d2071andvip0wj.cloudfront.net/the-dark-side-of-transition-violence-against-muslims-in-myanmar.pdf.
-----. 2016. Myanmar: A New Muslim Insurgency in Rakhine State. Brussels: International Crisis Group. Accessed March 12, 2020. https://d2071andvip0wj.cloudfront.net/283-myanmar-a-new-muslim-insurgency-in-rakhine-state.pdf.
-----. 2012. Myanmar: Storm Clouds on the Horizon. Brussels: International Crisis Group. Accessed February 12, 2019. https://d2071andvip0wj.cloudfront.net/238-myanmar-storm-clouds-on-the-horizon.pdf.
-----. 2014. Myanmar: The Politics of Rakhine State. Brussels: International Crisis Group. Accessed March 10, 2020. https://d2071andvip0wj.cloudfront.net/myanmar-the-politics-of-rakhine-state.pdf.
-----. 2017b. Myanmar’s Rohingya Crisis Enters a Dangerous New Phase. Brussels: International Crisis Group. Accessed March 15, 2020. https://d2071andvip0wj.cloudfront.net/292-myanmar-s-rohingya-crisis-enters-a-dangerous-new-phase.pdf.
Janjira Sombatpoonsiri. 2016. “‘Khao Santi Withi Ma Rao Ko Santi Withi Klap’: Kanmueang Khong Patisamphan Santiwithi Rawang Phu Chumnum Kap Chaonathirat Sueksa Korani Kan Prathuang Na Matsayit Klang Changwat Pattani Wanthi 31 Phruetsaphakhom Thueng 4 Mithunayon 2550.” [“They Use Non-Violence, We Respond with Non-Violence”: Politics of Non-Violent Interactions between Protesters and the State]. In Phuenthi Santi Withi Honthang Sangkhom Thai: Khwamru Khwam Lap Khwam Song Cham [Nonviolence Space and Thailand Future: Knowledge, Secret, Memory], edited by Chaiwat Satha-Anand. Bangkok: Protestista. (in Thai)
Jerryson, Michael K. 2009. “Appropriating a Space for Violence: State Buddhism in Southern Thailand.” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 40(1): 33–57.
-----. 2012. Buddhist Fury: Religion and Violence in Southern Thailand. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-----. 2010. “Militarizing Buddhism: Violence in Southern Thailand.” In Buddhist Warfare, edited by Michael Jerryson and Mark Juergensmeyer. New York: Oxford University Press.
Jesada Buaban. 2020. “Islamophobia as Represented by Thai Buddhist Organizations.” Journal of Social Sciences 50(2): 125-147.
Keyes, Charles. 2016. “Theravada Buddhism and Buddhist Nationalism: Sri Lanka, Myanmar, Cambodia, and Thailand.” The Review of Faith and International Affairs 14(4): 41–52.
Kuo, Lily. 2013. “2.5 Million Burmese Support a Measure to Restrict Marriage between Muslims and Buddhists.” Quartz, July 18. Accessed June 27, 2020. https://qz.com/105790/2-5-million-burmese-support-a-measure-to-restrict-marriage-between-muslims-and-buddhists.
Kyaw, Nyi Nyi. 2016. “Islamophobia in Buddhist Myanmar: The 969 Movement and Anti-Muslim Violence.” In Islam and the State in Myanmar: Muslim-Buddhist Relations and the Politics of Belonging, edited by Melissa Crouch, 183-210. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kymlicka, Will. 1996. Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lewis, Simon, Zeba Siddiqui, Clare Baldwin, and Andrew R.C. Marshall. 2018. “The Shock Troops Who Expelled the Rohingya from Myanmar.” Reuters, June 26, Accessed June 17, 2020. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-myanmar-rohingya-battalions-specialre-idUSKBN1JM1X7.
Mann, Zarni, and Samantha Michaels. 2013. “Petition to Restrict Interfaith Marriage Garners 2.5 Million Signatures in Burma.” The Irrawaddy, July 18. Accessed October 20, 2020. https://www.irrawaddy.com/news/burma/petition-to-restrict-interfaith-marriage-garners-2-5-million-signatures-in-burma.html.
McCargo, Duncan. 2004. “Buddhism, Democracy and Identity in Thailand.” Democratization 11(4): 155–170.
-----. 2009b. “The Politics of Buddhist Identity in Thailand’s Deep South: The Demise of Civil Religion?” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 40(1): 11-32. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022463409000022.
-----. 2008. Tearing Apart the Land: Islam and Legitimacy in Southern Thailand. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
-----. 2009a. “Thai Buddhism, Thai Buddhists and the Southern Conflict.” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 40(1): 1-10.
Naing, Shoon. 2020. “Rohingya Politicians Excluded from Myanmar Election.” Reuters, August 25, Accessed December 12, 2020. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-myanmar-election-rohingya-idUSKBN25L02T.
Pakawadee Suphunchitwana. 2018. “Khwam Mai Khunkhoei Kap Kan Totan Kan Sang Matsayit Nai Phuenthi Phaknuea Khong Thai.” [Unfamiliarity and Resistance against Mosque Construction in Northern Region of Thailand]. Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research in Asia 24(2): 3-32. (in Thai)
Prachatai. 2006. “Surayud Khothot Khon Tai Thaen Ratthaban Chut Thilaeo.” [Surayud Apologies Southern People on Behalf of the Previous Government]. Prachatai, November 3. Accessed October 15, 2020. https://prachatai.com/ journal/2006/11/10360. (in Thai)
Quinley III, John. 2019. Tools of Genocide: National Verification Cards and the Denial of Citizenship of Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar. [Southeast Asia]: Fortify Rights.
Republic of the Union of Myanmar. 2014. The Counter Terrorism Law (The Pyidaungsu Hluttaw Law No.23, 2014). Nay Pyi Taw: Republic of the Union of Myanmar.
Republic of the Union of Myanmar. Inquiry Commission on Sectarian Violence in Rakhine State. 2013. Final Report of Inquiry Commission on Sectarian Violence in Rakhine State. Nay Pyi Taw: Republic of the Union of Myanmar.
Selth, Andrew. 2018. Burma (Myanmar) since the 1988 Uprising: A Select Bibliography. 3rd ed. Brisbane: Griffith Asia Institute, Griffith University. Accessed October 17, 2020. https://www.griffith.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0032/ 485942/Burma-Bibliography-2018-Selth-web.pdf.
The Senate of the United States. Committee on Foreign Relations. 2017. “Calling for International Accountability for the Crime against Humanity Committed by the Burmese Military against the Rohingya in Burma: S. RES. 360, 115th CONGRESS 1st Session.” Washington, DC: The Senate of the United States. Accessed October 12, 2020. https://www.congress.gov/ 115/bills/sres360/BILLS-115sres360is.xml.
Smith, Matthew, and Taylor Landis. 2014. Policies of Persecution: Ending Abusive State Policies against Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar. [Southeast Asia]: Fortify Rights. Accessed June 14, 2020. https://fortifyrights.org/downloads/ Policies_of_Persecution_Feb_25_Fortify_Rights.pdf.
Smith, Matthew, Amy Matthew, Puttanee Kangkun, Taimoor Sobhan, Nickey Diamond, John Quinley III, Jillian Tuck, Zaw Win, and Abu Maria. 2018. They Give Them Long Swords: Preparations for Genocide and Crimes against Humanity against Rohingya Muslims in Rakhine State, Myanmar. [Southeast Asia]: Fortify Rights.
Suchart Settamalinee. 2016. “Islamophobia: Rok Rai Thi Tong Rip Yiaoya.” [Islamophobia: Dangerous Disease That Must Be Cured Urgently]. Deep South Watch, May 16. Accessed October 16, 2020. https://www.deepsouthwatch.org/ node/8715. (in Thai)
Sutthana Vichitrananda, Nuchanad Juntavises, and Ekkarin Tuansiri. 2020. Reintegration: Voices from the Conflict-Affected Deep South. Bangkok: World Bank Group, Thailand Office.
Sydney Southeast Asia Centre – SSEAC. 2020. “Mobilising Buddhist Nationalists: How Hegemonic Anxiety Shapes Politico-Religious Activism in Thailand.” Facebook, April 21. https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=230731631575776.
Tea Circle. 2019. “Bibliography of Burma Studies.” Transnational Network of Theravada Studies (TNTS), September 20. Accessed January 10, 2020. https://theravadastudies.org/2019/09.
Thailand. Office of the Royal Society. [2013]. “Samnakngan Ratchabandittayasapha Chichaeng Kham ‘Rohingya’ Lae ‘Myanmar’.” [Office of the Royal Society of Thailand Explains How to Spell the Words ‘Rohingya’ and ‘Myanmar’ in Thai].” Accessed May 5, 2021. http://legacy.orst.go.th/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Rohingya.pdf. (in Thai)
United Nations Human Rights Council. Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on Myanmar (IIFFMM). 2018. “Report of the Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on Myanmar.” A/HRC/39/64. Thirty-Ninth Session, 10-27 September 2018. Geneva: United Nations Human Rights Council. Accessed January 23, 2020. https://www.ohchr.org/ Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/FFM-Myanmar/A_HRC_39_64.pdf.
-----. 2019. “Detailed Findings of the Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on Myanmar.” A/HRC/42/CRP.5. Forty-Second Session, 9-27 September 2019. Geneva: United Nations Human Rights Council. Accessed January 23, 2020. https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/A_HRC_42_CRP.pdf.
Walton, Matthew J., and Susan Hayward. 2014. Contesting Buddhist Narratives: Democratization, Nationalism, and Communal Violence in Myanmar. Honolulu: East-West Center.
Yegar, Moshe. 2002. Between Integration and Secession: The Muslim Communities of the Southern Philippine, Southern Thailand and Western Burma/Myanmar. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Yusuf, Imtiyaz. 2017. “Nationalist Ethnicities as Religious Identities: Islam, Buddhism and Citizenship in Myanmar.” American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences 34(4): 100-119.
Downloads
เผยแพร่แล้ว
How to Cite
ฉบับ
บท
License
Copyright (c) 2022 คณะรัฐศาสตร์ จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
