The Doctrine of Good Faith in Constitutional Order
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61462/cujss.v46i1.1191Keywords:
Good faith, General Principle of Law, Social Contract, Constitutional Contract, Relational ContractAbstract
Good faith is a legal concept considered one of the most significant general principles of law. The concept draws its origin from creating contracts during the Roman Era. This principle is usually applied to make sure that each contracting party will perform his duties honestly and properly. On this ground, good faith is deemed to be a “legal tool” to protect a party from damages caused by omitting his obligations or abusing of rights.
Although originally developed from contract law, one of the private laws, it, on the basis of in-depth research, is found that good faith is applied to the public law as well. Therefore this important principle should be applied to the Constitutions as a public law in order to give justice to societies.
Downloads
References
Antony Black. Political Though in Europe, 1250-1450. 2000. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bardes, Barbara, Shelley, Mack, and Schmidt, Steffan. American Government and Politics Today: Essentials 2015-2016. 2015. 3 Edition. USA: Cengage Learning.
Baker, Scott and Choi, Albert. 2015. Contract’s Role in Relational Contract Virginia Law Review Vol.101 No.3.
Bailey, Jeremy. Thomas Jefferson and Executive Power. 2007. USA: Cambridge University Press.
Binzen, Nathaniel. Rethinking the State of Nature: Lockes’ Two Treatises of Government. 2000. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Borwonsak Uwanno. 1995. Khamattibai Kodmaimahachon Lem 3: Teema Laenitivitee. Bankok : Nititham Publishing. (in Thai)
Brunner, Christoph. Force Majeure and Hardship Under General Contract Principles: Exemption for Non-Performance in International Arbitration. 2009. Netherland: Kluwer Law International.
Canning, Josep, The Political Though of Baldus de Ubaldis. 2003. 3 Edition. USA: Cambridge University Press.
Chemerinsky, Erwin. Constitutional Law: Principles and Policies. 2006. New York: Aspen Publishers.
Dainow, Joseph. 1997. “The Civil Law and the Common Law: Some Points of Comparison.” American Journal of Comparative Law Vol.15, 3: 432-433.
Donaldson, Thomas. Corporations and Morality. 1982. USA: Prentice-Hall.
Ducat, Craig. Constitutional Interpretation. 2013. 10 edition. Canada: Nelson Education Ltd.
Evers, Williamson M. 1977. “Social Contract: A Critique.” Journal of Libertarian Studies Vol. 1 No. 3.
Fauvarque-Cosson, Bénédicte and Mazeaud, Denis. European Contract Law: Materials for a Common Frame of Reference: Terminology, Guiding Principles, Model Rules. 2008. Munich: European Law Publishers.
Fleming, James E. Fidelity to Our Imperfect Constitution: For Moral Readings and Against Originalism. 2015. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fox, Gregory H. and Roth, Brad R. Democratic Governance and International Law. 2000. USA: Cambridge University Press.
Gibson, Edmind. Of the English Reformation against the Doctrine of Papal Supremacy. 1738. London: H. Knaplock.
Graber, Mark A. Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil. 2006. USA: Cambridge University Press.
Irvine, Lord of Laig. Human Rights, Constitutional Law and the Development of the English Legal system. 2003. USA: Hart Publishing.
Kelsen, Hans. Pure Theory of Law. 1967. New Jersey: The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd.
Klosko, George. The Oxford Handbook of the History of Political Philosophy. 2011. USA: Oxford University Press.
Kotzur, Markus. 2009. Goof Faith (Bona Fide), Oxford Public International Law Vol.4: 1.
Louw, AM. 2013. “Yet Another Call For A Greater Role For Good Faith In the South African Law Contract: Can We Banish the Law of the Jungle, While Avoiding the Elephant in the Room.” Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal Vol.16, No.5: 62.
Löwenstein, Karl. Political Power and Governmental Process. 1957. USA: University of Chicago Press.
Lutz, Donald S. Principle of Constitutional Design. 2006. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Madsen, Marcia G. and Litteken, Michelle E. 2014. “The Implied Duty of Good Faith & Fair Dealing in Government & Commercial Contracts: An Age-Old Concept in Need of an Update?.” United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Federal Practice Summit: 3.
Marcus Tullius Cicero. De Officiis (English Version by Walter Miller) Book III. 1798. New York: The Macmillan CO.
McCamus, John D. 2004. “Abuse of Discretion, Failure to Cooperate and Evasion of Duty: Unpacking the Common Law Duty of Good Faith Contractual Performance.” the Advocates’ Quarterly Vol.29, No.1: 72.
O’Cinneide, Colm and Stelzer, Manfred. Horizontal Effect/State Action in Routledge Hanbook of Constitutional Law. 2013. USA: Routledge.
Pikington, Colin. The Politics Today Companion to British Constitution. 1999. UK: Manchester University Press.
Sacconi, Lorenzo. The Social Contract of the Firm: Economics, Ethics and Organisation. 2000. New York: Springer.
Schwöbe, Christine E. J. Global Constitutionalism in International Legal Perspective. 2011. Netherland: Hotei Publishing.
Shapiro, Scott J. 2007. “The “Hart-Dworkin” Debate: A Short Guide for the Perplexed." Public law and legal theory working papers series working paper, no. 77. Michigan: University of Michigan Law School.
Tigar, Michael E. 1965. “Automatic Extinction of Cross-Demands: Compensation from Rome to California.” California Law Review Vol.53: 229.
Vanberg, Viktor J. The Constitution of Markets: Essays in Political Economy. 2001. USA: Routledge.
Vinter, Forsythe. Constitutional Comparison: Japan, Germany, Canada and South Africa. 2000. USA: Kluwer Law International.
Visser, Daniel. Private Law and Human Rights: Bringing Rights Home in Scotland and South Africa. 2013. Great Britain: Edinburg University Press.
Vorapot Visarupit. 1995. Siti Sereepab Tam Rattatamanoon. Bangkok : Winyuchon Publishing. (in Thai)
Yud Saeng-U-Thai. 2009. Kwamrubuengton Kewkubkodmaitoipai. Bangkok : Thammasat University Publishing. (in Thai)
Zetterquist, Ola. 2007. “A European Social Contract?. ” Scandinavian Studies in Law Vol. 52: 330.
Zimmermann, Reinhard. 1996. The law of obligations: Roman foundations of the civilian tradition. New York: Oxford University Press.
Zimmerman, Reinhard and Whittaker, Simon. Good Faith in European Contract Law. 2000. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Faculty of Political Science, Chulalongkorn University

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Public Licensing Terms
Copyright and Licensing Policy
The Chulalongkorn University Journal of Social Science publishes all content under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
Copyright
All published articles in the Chulalongkorn University Journal of Social Science are the copyright of the Faculty of Political Science, Chulalongkorn University. Authors transfer all rights to the journal upon acceptance of their manuscript for publication.
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 License
Under this license:
-
Attribution (BY): Users must give appropriate credit to the authors, the Faculty of Political Science, Chulalongkorn University, and the Chulalongkorn University Journal of Social Science, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. They may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses them or their use.
-
NonCommercial (NC): Users may not use the material for commercial purposes. Commercial use requires prior written permission from both the authors and the Faculty of Political Science, Chulalongkorn University.
-
NoDerivatives (ND): If users remix, transform, or build upon the material, they may not distribute the modified material. Adaptations of the work require prior written permission from both the authors and the Faculty of Political Science, Chulalongkorn University.
Open Access Statement
The Chulalongkorn University Journal of Social Science provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, in accordance with the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license.
Self-Archiving Policy
Authors may archive the final published version, preprints, or postprints of their articles in institutional repositories or on their personal websites, provided that they acknowledge the original publication in the Chulalongkorn University Journal of Social Science with a complete citation and a link to the journal's website.
Permissions
For any use beyond those covered by the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, please contact:
Editorial Office
Chulalongkorn University Journal of Social Science
Faculty of Political Science, Chulalongkorn University
Email: cusocscij@gmail.com
For more information about the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, please visit: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/