A Study of Disaster Management Mechanisms at Area Level

Authors

  • Siriruk Sinhasema Faculty of Political Science, Ramkhamhaeng University
  • Wasan Luangprapat Faculty of Political Science Thammasat University
  • Pattarawut Choeisiri Center for Local Governance Studies: Sanya Dharmasakti Institute for Democracy Thammasat University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61462/cujss.v51i1.693

Keywords:

disaster management mechanism in area level, district cluster disaster prevention and mitigation office, disaster manager, disaster risk reduction

Abstract

The establishment of the Department of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation to handle disaster management was a key agenda in the 2002 Thai Government’s policy of reforming the bureaucracy. This research article aims to investigate and analyze problems associated with disaster management at the area level and to suggest a model for improvement. By conducting case studies in 8 provinces, limitations were found in the working process, the mechanism and the management structure. The study proposes three models of structural adjustment, namely, provincial, district cluster, and district levels. However, the district cluster level is emphasized as, in terms of management principles, it stands to be the structure with the expertise and authority likely to be most able to carry out the tasks. In any case, since one size does not fit all, implementation at the area level would vary with the type of disaster, the local context. The capacity of the networking, for instance. In the end, success would depend on the capacity of the disaster prevention and mitigation managers.

Downloads

References

Harfst, Jan. 2006. A Practitioner's Guide to Area-Based Development Programming. New York: UNDP Regional Bureau for Europe and Commonwealth of Independent States.

Shah, Anwar, and Sana Shah. 2006. “The New Vision of Local Governance and the Evolving Roles of Local Governments.” In Local Governance in Developing Countries, edited by Anwar Shah, 1-46. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

Sisk, Timothy D. 2001. Democracy at the Local Level: The International IDEA Handbook on Participation, Representation, Conflict Management, and Governance.Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.

Siriruk Sinhasema, Wasan Luangprapat, and Pattarawut Choeisiri. 2019. Kansueksa Wichai Konkai Kan Borihan Chatkan Satharanaphai Nai Radap Phuenthi. [The Study of the Disaster Management Mechanism in Area-Level]. Bangkok: Thammasat University Research and Consultancy Institute.

Tavida Kamolvej, Vannapar Tirasangka, Sikarn lssarachaiyos, and Parichat Krongkun. 2019. Kan Okbaep Mattrakan Mai Chai Choeng Khrongsang Nai Kan Lot Khwam Siang Phaiphibat Phaendinwai Lae Akhan Thalom Samrap Prathet Thai. [Non-Structural Measure Design of Earthquake Risk Reduction in Thailand]. Bangkok: The Thailand Research Fund. (in Thai)

Wasan Luangprapat, and Chai Chaiyachit. 2019. “‘Kan Aphiban’ (Governance) Nai Thana Manothat Thang Kan Borihanratthakit.” [‘Governance’ as a Concept of Public Administration]. Ratthasatsarn 39(3): 140-199. (in Thai)

Downloads

Published

06-09-2022

How to Cite

Sinhasema, Siriruk, Wasan Luangprapat, and Pattarawut Choeisiri. 2022. “A Study of Disaster Management Mechanisms at Area Level”. Chulalongkorn University Journal of Social Sciences 51 (1). Bangkok, Thailand:73-96. https://doi.org/10.61462/cujss.v51i1.693.

Issue

Section

Research Articles