The Thai Style Democratic Regime (2006- 2017) in Thai Bureaucratic Polity after the Thaksin Chinnawatra Period
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61462/cujss.v49i1.736Keywords:
Thai bureaucratic polity, Thaksin Shinawatra, Thai-style democratic regime, coups, independent agenciesAbstract
Since the 2006 coup against the Thaksin Shinawatra government, Thai political structure has been transformed into a stronger bureaucratic polity. Over the subsequent decade (2006-2017), the Thai state remained unsuccessful in solving problems in the areas of the economy, political legitimacy, security and democratization. Using historical institutionalism, supplemented by a state-society approach and structuralism, as analytical framework, this study examines the power structure underlying the Thai-style democracy of the Thai bureaucratic polity. The Thai-style democracy involved the establishment of authoritarianism both in the constitutions and in social values inculcation, so as to manage problematic political conflicts. However, such a regime has to contend with pressures both internal and external to the state for democratization. Its response was to introduce the new mechanism of independent agencies to check and balance the political institutions. The military held the reins of government and a network of lawyers was engaged in adjusting the social structure. The military government uses the government bureaucracy to set and implement policies that still continue to promote values associated with patrimonial royalist clientelism and strengthen the Thai bureaucratic polity. Therefore, even if the Thai state should allow elections to be held and elected government to be installed, the Thai-style democracy, long entrenched, would continue to hinder the development of democracy and to drag the Thai state back toward the cycle of coups and authoritarian government.
Downloads
References
Adinant Prompanjai. 2015. “Rat Ratchakan Thai Nai Samai Phon-ek Prem Tinsulanonda: Panha Rabop Prachathippatai Khrueng Bai (2523-2531).” [The Thai Bureaucratic Polity during the General Prem Tinsulanonda Period: Problems of a Semi-democratic Regime (1980 –1988)]. Journal of Social Sciences 45(2): 75-104. (in Thai)
Attachak Sattayanurak. 2014. Prachathippatai Khon Thai Mai Thao Kan. [Unequal in Thai Democracy]. Bangkok: Matichon. (in Thai)
Doner, Richard F. 2009. The Politics of Uneven Development: Thailand’s Economic Growth in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Girling, John L.S. 1981. The Bureaucratic Polity in Modernizing Societies: Similarities, Differences, and Prospects in the ASEAN Region. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Hall, Peter A., and Rosemary C. R. Taylor. 1996. “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms.” Political Studies 44(5): 936-957.
Kasian Tejapira. 2014. “Rat Ratchakan Thai Nai Saita Fred Riggs” [Bureaucratic Polity in Fred Riggs’s View]. Matichon Weekly, September 26 – October 2, 49. (in Thai)
Katznelson, Ira. 1997. “Strong Theory, Complex History: Structure and Configuration in Comparative Politics Revisited.” In Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure, edited by Mark Irving Lichbach, and Alan S. Zuckerman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
“Mattra 44 Yang Bangkhap Chai Ro Ratthaban Mai Yokloek.” [Section 44 Still in Effect. Wait for the New Government Cancel]. 2017. Bangkokbiznews, April 8. Accessed August 29, 2017. http://www.bangkokbiznews.com/news/detail/749259. (in Thai)
“Muea ‘Phinyo’ Tham ‘Anand’ Khun Henduai Kap Rat Prahan Khrang Ni Khae Nai?” [When Phinyo Traisuriyathamma Asked Anand Panyarachun "How Much Do You Agree With the Coup?”]. 2013. Matichon Online. Accessed August 11, 2017. http://m.matichon.co.th/ readnews.php?newsid=140803 5092. (in Thai)
Nithi Eawsriwong. 2017. Naeokhit Prachathippatai Khong Anuraksaniyom Thai (1). [Thai Conservative Groups’ Concept of Democracy]. Matichon Online. Accessed August 29, 2017. https://www. matichon.co.th/news/584555.
-----. 2015. “Thima Thang Sangkhom Khong Suea Lueang Salim – Nokwit (2).” [Source of Yellow Shirts, “Salim” and Whistle (2)]. Matichon Online. Accessed June 2, 2017. http://www.matichon.co.th/news_detail. php?newsid =1432536657.
North, Douglass C.1990. Institution, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
“‘Prayut' Nam Khor Ror Mor Khao Uaiphon Pimai 'Pa Prem’.'' [‘Prayut’ Brought His Cabinet to Wish ‘Prem’ a Happy New Year]. 2014. Thairath Online, December 29. Accessed August 29, 2017. https://www.thairath.co.th/content/471839. (in Thai)
Rangsan Thanapornpan. 1993. Anitchalaksana Khong Kanmueang: Thai Setthasat Wikhro Wa Duai Kanmueang. [Permanent Appearance of Thai Politics: Economic Analysis of Politics]. Bangkok: Phuchatkan.
Riggs, Fred. 1966. Thailand the Modernization of a Bureaucratic Polity. Honolulu: East-west Center Press.
Sathithorn Thananithichot. 2007. “Pharuetikam Niyom Lae Sathaban Niyom Nai Kanmueang Rueang Kanlueaktang Khong Thai.” [Behaviorism and Institutionalism in the Politics of Thai Elections]. Journal of King Prajadhipok's Institute 5(3): 1-25. (in Thai)
Steinmo, Sven. 2008. “What is Historical Institutionalism?” In Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective, edited by Donatella Della Porta and Michael Keating Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Streeck, Wolfgang, and Kathleen Thelen. 2005. “Introduction: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies.” In Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, edited by Wolfgang Streeck and Kathleen Thelen, 1-39. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Accessed September 9, 2014. http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream
/handle/document/19498/ssoar-2005-streeck_et_al-introduction_institutional_change_ in_advanced.pdf?sequence=1.
Suchit Bunbongkarn. 1999. Kan Phatthana Thang Kanmueang Khong Thai: Patisamphan Rawang Thahan Sathaban Thang Kanmueang Lae Kan Mi Suanruam Thang Kanmueang Khong Prachachon. [Thai Political Development: Interactions between Soldiers, Political Institutions and Popular Participation]. 4th ed. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press. (in Thai)
Sumalee Panyura. [n.d.]. Rabop Prachathippatai Baep Thai (2501-2519). [Thai-Style Democracy (1958-1976)]. Nonthaburi: King Prajadhipok's Institute. Accessed August 29, 2017. http://wiki.kpi.ac.th/index.php?title=ระบอบประชาธิปไตยแบบไทย. (in Thai)
Surachat Bamrungsuk. 2015. SenaThipatai :Ratthaprahan Kap Kanmueang Thai. [Praetorianism Coups and Thai Politics]. Bangkok: Matichon. (in Thai)
Thongchai Vinijakul. 2014. “Riakwa ‘Pracha Thip’ Thai.” In Pracha Thip’ Thai: Sarakhadi Doi Pen-Ek Ratanaruang Lae Pasakorn Pramunwongse. [Call It “Prachatipa ‘Thai’”: A Documentary by Pen-Ek Ratanaruang and Pasakorn Pramunwongse], edited by Chanan Yodhong, 30-47. 3rd ed. Bangkok: Matichon. (in Thai)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Faculty of Political Science, Chulalongkorn University

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Public Licensing Terms
Copyright and Licensing Policy
The Chulalongkorn University Journal of Social Science publishes all content under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
Copyright
All published articles in the Chulalongkorn University Journal of Social Science are the copyright of the Faculty of Political Science, Chulalongkorn University. Authors transfer all rights to the journal upon acceptance of their manuscript for publication.
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 License
Under this license:
-
Attribution (BY): Users must give appropriate credit to the authors, the Faculty of Political Science, Chulalongkorn University, and the Chulalongkorn University Journal of Social Science, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. They may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses them or their use.
-
NonCommercial (NC): Users may not use the material for commercial purposes. Commercial use requires prior written permission from both the authors and the Faculty of Political Science, Chulalongkorn University.
-
NoDerivatives (ND): If users remix, transform, or build upon the material, they may not distribute the modified material. Adaptations of the work require prior written permission from both the authors and the Faculty of Political Science, Chulalongkorn University.
Open Access Statement
The Chulalongkorn University Journal of Social Science provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, in accordance with the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license.
Self-Archiving Policy
Authors may archive the final published version, preprints, or postprints of their articles in institutional repositories or on their personal websites, provided that they acknowledge the original publication in the Chulalongkorn University Journal of Social Science with a complete citation and a link to the journal's website.
Permissions
For any use beyond those covered by the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, please contact:
Editorial Office
Chulalongkorn University Journal of Social Science
Faculty of Political Science, Chulalongkorn University
Email: cusocscij@gmail.com
For more information about the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, please visit: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/