ความคิดทางการเมืองไทยในนโยบายการพัฒนา
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61462/cujss.v51i2.682คำสำคัญ:
ความคิดทางการเมือง, นโยบายการพัฒนา, อำนาจและความชอบธรรมของรัฐ, วาทกรรมวิเคราะห์เชิงวิพากษ์, การเมืองไทยบทคัดย่อ
เบื้องหลังของทุกนโยบายการพัฒนาประกอบด้วยความคิดทางการเมือง ซึ่งรัฐอาศัยอำนาจในการประกอบสร้าง “ความรู้” และ “แนวทาง” การพัฒนาโดยมีเป้าหมายให้เกิดผลดังเช่นที่รัฐต้องการ บทความวิจัยนี้มุ่งศึกษาความคิดทางการเมืองไทยในนโยบายการพัฒนา โดยอาศัยแนวทางการวิเคราะห์วาทกรรมเชิงวิพากษ์ ซึ่งตัวบทที่เลือกมาศึกษา ได้แก่ คู่มือการขับเคลื่อนการพัฒนาประเทศผ่านโครงการไทยนิยม ยั่งยืน ที่รัฐบาลคณะรักษาความสงบแห่งชาติ (คสช.) เป็นผู้ผลิตและตั้งใจถ่ายทอดเนื้อหาดังกล่าวให้ประชาชนผ่านการจัดเวทีในหมู่บ้านและชุมชนก่อนการเลือกตั้งในปี พ.ศ. 2562 ตัวบทดังกล่าวสะท้อนความคิดทางการเมืองของรัฐบาล คสช. ในเรื่อง 1) ประชาธิปไตยไทยนิยมและสากลนิยม 2) การเลือกตั้งคนดี 3) รัฐอุปถัมภ์ และ 4) ประชาชนเป็นผู้รับการอุปถัมภ์ ซึ่งความคิดและปฏิบัติการทางวาทกรรมของรัฐบาล คสช. เป็นการผสมผสานรูปแบบดั้งเดิมและรูปแบบใหม่ ด้วยหวังว่าจะสามารถรักษาความเป็นอำนาจนิยม พร้อมไปกับการได้รับการยอมรับจากประชาชน ทั้งหมดนี้สามารถเข้าใจได้ผ่านบริบททางเศรษฐกิจ สังคมและการเมืองของนโยบายการพัฒนาของไทยตั้งแต่อดีตสู่ปัจจุบัน
Downloads
References
Adinant Prompanjai. 2019. “Rabop Prachathippatai Baep Thai Thai (2549-2560) Nai Rat Ratchakan Thai Lang Samai Thaksin Shinawatra.” [Thai Style Democratic Regime (2006-2017) in Thai Bureaucratic Polity after the Thaksin Shinawatra Period]. Journal of Social Sciences 49(1): 57-80. (in Thai)
Ahmed, Zahir. 2006. “Development as Discourse, Discourse as Practice.” The Journal of Social Studies: Journal of the Centre for Social Studies 115: 1-9.
Anek Laothamathas. 1992. Business Associations and the New Political Economy of Thailand: From Bureaucratic Polity to Liberal Corporatism. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Anusorn Limmanee. 2015. Rat Sangkhom Lae Kan Plianplaeng: Kan Phicharana Nai Choeng Amnat Nayobai Lae Khrueakhai Khwam Samphan. [State, Society, and Change: Considerations in Terms of Power, Policy, and Relationship Network]. Bangkok: Siam. (in Thai)
Anyarat Chattharakul. 2010. “Thai Electoral Campaigning: Vote-Canvassing Networks and Hybrid Voting.” Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 29(4): 67-95.
Apichart Satitniramai, and Anusorn Unno. 2017. “Kanmueang Khon Di: Khwamkhit Patibatkan Lae Attalak Thang Kanmueang Khong Phu Sanapsanun Khabuankan Plianplaeng Prathet Thai. [“Good Men’s Politics”: Political Thoughts, Practices, and Identities of “Change Thailand Movement” Supporters]. Bangkok: Thailand Research Fund (TRF). (in Thai)
Aram, Ziai. 2013. “The Discourse of ‘Development’ and Why the Concept Should Be Abandoned.” Development in Practice 23(1): 123-136.
Atchara Rakyutidham. 2011. “Kan Phatthana Thanglueak Krasae Lak.” [Mainstreaming Alternative Development]. Journal of Sociology and Anthropology 30(2): 13-43. (in Thai)
Bacchi, Carol. 2000. “Policy as Discourse: What Does It Mean? Where Does It Get Us?” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 21(1): 45-57.
Baker, Chris. 2016. “The 2014 Thai Coup and Some Roots of Authoritarianism.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 46(3): 388-404.
Baxter, Leslie A., and Earl R. Babbie. 2004. The Basics of Communication Research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
Bidhya Bowornwathana. 2013. “Autonomisation of the Thai State: Some Observations.” Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration 35(2): 183-194.
Burnham, Peter, Karin Gilland Lutz, Wyn Grant, and Zig Layton-Henry. 2008. Research Methods in Politics. 2nd ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Carreon, Jonathan R., and Chavalin Svetanant. 2017. “What Lies Underneath a Political Speech? Critical Discourse Analysis of Thai PM’s Political Speeches Aired on the TV Programme Returning Happiness to the People.” Open Linguistics 3(1): 638-655.
Chai-Anan Samudavanija. 2001. Chak Rat Chat Su Rat Talat: Naeo Khwamkhit Kiaokap Rat Lae Sangkhom Nai Yuk Lokanuwat. [From Nation-State to Market-State: Concepts about State and Society in Globalisation Period]. Bangkok: Baan Phra Arthit. (in Thai)
Chairat Charoensin-o-larn. 2012. “A New Politics of Desire and Disintegration in Thailand.” In Bangkok, May 2010: Perspectives on a Divided Thailand, edited by Michael J. Montesano, Pavin Chachavalpongpun and Aekapol Chongvilaivan, 87-96. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Cleaves, Peter S. 1980. “Implementation Amidst Scarcity and Apathy: Political Power and Policy Design.” In Politics and Policy Implementation in the Third World, edited by Merilee S. Grindle, 281-286. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Connors, Michael. 2003. “Goodbye to the Security State: Thailand and Ideological Change.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 33(4): 431-448.
Desatova, Petra. 2018. “Thailand 4.0 and the Internal Focus of Nation Branding.” Asian Studies Review 42(4): 682-700.
Dukalskis, Alexander, and Johannes Gerschewski. 2017. “What Autocracies Say (and What Citizens Hear): Proposing Four Mechanisms of Autocratic Legitimation.” Contemporary Politics 23(3): 251-268.
Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London; New York: Longman.
Freeden, Michael. 2011. “Political Thinking as Power.” In Encyclopedia of Power, edited by Keith Dowding, 492-496. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Girling, John. 1996. Interpreting Development: Capitalism, Democracy, and the Middle Class in Thailand. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Herath, Dhammikah. 2009. “The Discourse of Development, Has It Reached Maturity?” Third World Quarterly 30(8): 1449-1464.
Howarth, David. 2009. “Power, Discourse, and Policy: Articulating a Hegemony Approach to Critical Policy Studies.” Critical Policy Studies 3(3-4): 309-335.
Janks, Hilary. 1997. “Critical Discourse Analysis as a Research Tool.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 18(3): 329-342.
Jha, Ganganath. 2011. “Thai Politics in the Post-Thaksin Period.” India Quarterly 67(4): 325-339.
Kasian Tejapira. 2017. Ko Ba Khru Ben Song Len Du Lok. [On Ben Andersons’s Shoulders Viewing the World through a Comparative Historical Lens]. Bangkok: Social Science and Human Science Textbook Program Foundation. (in Thai)
Kelly, Matthew, Phattaraphon Yutthaphonphinit, Sam-ang Seubsman, and Adrian C. Sleign. 2012. “Development Policy in Thailand: From Top-down to Grass Roots.” Asian Social Science 8(13): 29-39.
Kengkij Kitirianglarp. 2019. Khian Chonnabot Hai Pen Chat: Kamnoet Manutsayawitthaya Thai Nai Yuk Songkhramyen. [Write Rural to Be the Nation: The Birth of Thai Anthropology during the Cold War]. Bangkok: Matichon. (in Thai)
Leftwich, Adrian. 1995. “Bringing Politics Back In: Towards a Model of the Developmental State.” Journal of Development Studies 31(3): 400-427.
McCargo, Duncan. 1998. “Alternative Meanings of Political Reform in Contemporary Thailand.” The Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies 13: 5-30.
-----. 2012. “Two Cheers for Rally Politics.” In Bangkok, May 2010: Perspectives on a Divided Thailand, edited by Michael J. Montesano, Pavin Chachavalpongpun and Aekapol Chongvilaivan, 190-213. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
McGregor, Sue L. T. 2004. “Critical Discourse Analysis: A Primer.” Critical Science and Critical Discourse Analysis. 15(1). Accessed August 20, 2019. https://www.kon.org/archives/forum/15-1/mcgregorcda.html.
MGR Online. 2018. “Poet Ngop 2 Phanlan ‘Thai Niyom Yangyuen’ Liang Ahan Fri Hua La 40 Bat Tap/Khrang Khu! Khrai Mai Liang Ahan Mai Hai Boek Ngop Uen.” [Open the Two Billion Budget “Sustainable Thainess” Threat! Provide Food Free at 40 Baht Per Head. Whoever Does Not, Would Not Be Able to Procure Other Budget Items]. Accessed December 20, 2019. https://mgronline.com/politics/detail/9610000018832. (in Thai)
Ockey, James. 2004. “State, Bureaucracy and Polity in Modern Thai Politics.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 34(2): 143-162.
Omelicheva, Mariya Y. 2016. “Authoritarian Legitimation: Accessing Discourses of Legitimacy in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan.” Central Asian Survey 35(4): 481-500.
Orawan Pilun-owad. 2003. Krop Wathakam Wikhro Kap Korani Sueksa Thai. [Discourse Analysis Frameworks and Thai Cases]. Bangkok: Faculty of Communication Arts, Chulalongkorn University.
Panuwat Panduprasert. 2017 “Legitimacy and Military Rule in Today’s Thailand.” Kyoto Review of Southeast Asia. YAV20(January). Accessed November 11, 2019. https://kyotoreview.org/ yav/legitimacy-military-rule-thailand.
Prajak Kongkirati. 2019. “From Illiberal Democracy to Military Authoritarianism: Intra-Elite Struggle and Mass-Based Conflict in Deeply Polarized Thailand.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 681(1): 24-40.
Prajak Kongkirati, and Veerayooth Kanchoochat. 2018. “The Prayuth Regime: Embedded Military and Hierarchical Capitalism in Thailand.” TRaNS: Trans-Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia 6(2): 279-305.
Prapimphan Chiengkul. 2019. “Uneven Development, Inequality and Concentration of Power: A Critique of Thailand 4.0.” Third World Quarterly 40(9): 1689-1707. “Rat Yan Thai Niyom Kae Panha Thuk Miti-Roem Tio Khem 7 Kumphaphan.” [State Reiterates Thainess Solves All Dimensions of Problems, Starting Intensive Tutoring on February 7th]. 2018. Bangkok Biz News, January 29, 13,16. (in Thai)
Rist, Gilbert. 2010. “Development as a Buzzword.” In Deconstructing Development Discourse: Buzzwords and Fuzzwords, edited by Andrea Cornwall and Deborah Eade, 19-29. Warwickshire: Practical Action.
Saez, Lawrence, and Julia Gallagher. 2009. “Authoritarianism and Development in the Third World.” The Brown Journal of World Affairs 15(2): 87-101.
Savitri Gadavanij. 2020. “Contentious Polities and Political Polarization in Thailand: Post-Thaksin Reflections.” Discourse and Society 31(1): 44-63.
Schneider, Florian. 2013. “How to Do a Discourse Analysis.” Politics East Asia. Accessed October 12, 2018. http://www.politicseastasia.com/studying/how-to-do-a-discourse-analysis.
Sekeris, Petros G. 2015. “State Power, State Capacity, and Development.” Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy 21(4): 553-560.
Singh, Jewellord Nem, and Jesse Salah Ovadia. 2018. “The Theory and Practice of Building Developmental States in the Global South.” Third World Quarterly 39(6): 1033-1055.
Sombat Chantornvong, and Chai-Anan Samudavanija.1980. Khwamkhit Thang Kan Mueang Thai. [Thai Political Thoughts]. Bangkok: Thai Khadi Research Institute. (in Thai)
Tan, Michelle. 2012. “Passing Over in Silences: Ideology, Ideals and Ideas in Thai Translation.” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 43(1): 32-54.
Tapscott, Chris, Tor Halvorsen, and Teresita Cruz-Del Rosario. 2018. “Toward a Conceptualization of the Democratic Development State in Principle and Practice.” In the Democratic Developmental State: North-South Perspectives, edited by Chris Tapscott, Tor Halvorsen and Teresita Cruz-Del Rosario, 7-40. Stuttgart: ibidem Press.
Thai Government. 2018. Phraratchabanyat Ngoppraman Raichai Phoemtoem Pracham Pi Ngoppraman Pho So 2561. [Extra Budget Expenditure Act B.E. 2561]. 135(33 Gor): 19-26. Accessed January 11, 2020. http://www.ratchakitcha.soc.go.th/DATA/PDF/2561/A/033/19.PDF. (in Thai)
Thailand. Ministry of Interior. 2018. Khumue Kan Khapkhluean Kan Phatthana Prathet Tam Khrongkan Thai Niyom Yangyuen. [Handbook of Moving Forward Development under the Sustainable Thainess Programme]. Accessed April 20, 2018. http://www.stabundamrong.go.th/web/thainiyom/manual.pdf. (in Thai)
Thailand. Ministry of Interior, and National Institute of Development Administration (NIDA). 2019. Rai-ngan Sarup Chabap Phuborihan (Executive Summary) Krongkan Pramoenphon Kan Khapkhluean Kan Phatthana Prathet Tam Khrongkan Thai Niyom Yangyuen. [Executive Summary of the Evaluation Report on the Moving Forward the Country’s Development Following the Sustainable Thainess Project]. Accessed December 20, 2019. http://www.stabundamrong.go.th/web/manual/permanent_secretary/policy/policy3.pdf. (in Thai)
Thak Chaloemtiarana. 2007. Thailand: The Politics of Despotic Paternalism. Ithaca, NY: Southeast Asia Program Publications, Cornell University.
Thitinan Pongsudhirak. 2003. “Thailand: Democratic Authoritarianism.” In Southeast Asian Affairs 2003, edited by Daljit Singh and Chin Kin Wah, 277-290. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Thongchai Winichakul. 2000. “Quest for Siwilai: A Geographical Discourse of Civilizational Thinking in the Late 19th and Early 20th Century Siam.” The Journal of Asian Studies 59(3): 528-549.
Thorn Pitidol. 2016. “Redefining Democratic Discourse in Thailand’s Civil Society.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 46(3): 520-537.
Torfing, Jacobs. 2011. “Discourse.” In Encyclopedia of Power, edited by Keith Dowding. 191-196. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Turner, Mark M. 1990. “Authoritarian Rule and the Dilemma of Legitimacy: The Case of President Marcos of the Philippines.” The Pacific Review 3(4): 349-362.
Van Dijk, Teun A. 1993. “Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Discourse and Society 4(2): 249-283.
Vo, Long. 2013. “An Overview of Development State in Thailand: Formation and Implementation of State Capacity.” New Zealand Review of Economics and Finance 3(1): 20-39.
Downloads
เผยแพร่แล้ว
How to Cite
ฉบับ
บท
License
Copyright (c) 2021 คณะรัฐศาสตร์ จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
