Decolonial Epistemology and the Future of Thai IR Theory

Authors

  • Chyatat Supachalasai Faculty of Humanities and Social Science (Political Science Program), Suan Dusit University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61462/cujss.v47i1.779

Keywords:

decolonial epistemology, Thai IR theory, postcolonial theory

Abstract

This article aims to propose decolonial epistemology derived from an intellectual development of critical Latin American thinkers by suggesting it as a crucial lesson for the future development of Thai International Relations (IR) theory. It begins by addressing the limitations of postcolonial theory, and arguing that postcolonial theory does not connect its intellectual implications to the traumatised beings, either human beings or non-human beings, globally. Arguably, postcolonial theory is not instrumental for the construction of non-Western IR theories, including Thai IR theory. Therefore, the article deviates from postcolonial theory to highlight what Ramón Grosfoguel calls ‘decolonial turn’, a decolonisation from Western epistemology to advocate the world of ‘the pluriverse’. This pluriversal world is emphasised as one of the core aspects for the future of Thai IR theory. In addition, another key figure of decolonial thinker, Walter Mignolo, also emerges as a critic of Western philosophy and the prominent thinker who can create his own terminology or concept in opposition to some Western thinkers. This article acknowledges these Latin American thinkers to submit as a crucial lesson to Thai IR scholars, in our desire to acquire a theoretical and epistemological recognition within the discipline of IR.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agamben, Giorgio.1998. Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Bartolovich, Crystal. 2016. Postcolonial nature? Or, “If oil could speak, what would it say?”In What postcolonial theory doesn’t say, eds. Anna Bernard, Ziad Elmarsafy, and Stuart Murray. London: Routledge.

Bhabha, Homi. 1994. The location of culture. London: Routledge.

Cardenal, Ernesto. 2009. Pluriverse: New and selected poems, ed. Jonathan Cohen; trans. Jonathan Cohen, et al. New York: New Directions Publishing Corporation.

Cox, Robert. 1981. Social forces, states and world orders: Beyond international relations theory. Millennium – Journal of International Studies 10(2): 126-155.

Dabashi, Hamid. 2015. Can non-Europeans think?. London: Zed Books.

Fanon, Franz. 1963.The wretched of the earth. New York: Grove Press.

Freire, Paulo. 1970. Pedagogy of the oppressed. trans. Myra Bergman Ramos. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin Education.

Grosfoguel, Ramón. 2012. Decolonizing Western uni-versalisms: Decolonial pluri-versalism from Aimé Césaire to Zapatistas. Transmodernity: Journal of Peripheral Cultural Production of the Luso-Hispanic World 1(3): 88-104.

-----. 2011. Decolonizing post-colonial studies and paradigms of political-economy: Transmodernity, decolonial thinking and global coloniality. Transmodernity: Journal of Peripheral Cultural Production of the Luso-Hispanic World1(1).

-----. 2007. The epistemic decolonial turn: Beyond political-economy paradigms. Cultural Studies 21(2-3): 211-223.

Khader,Jamil. 2013.Žižek’s infidelity: Lenin, the national question, and the postcolonial legacy of revolutionary internationalism. In Žižek now: Current perspectives in Žižek studies, eds. Jamil Khader and Molly Anne Rothenberg. Malden, MA: Polity Press.

Mignolo, Walter. 2011(a).The darker side of western modernity: Global futures, decolonial options. London: Duke University Press.

-----. 1995. The darker side of the renaissance: Literary, territoriality, and colonization. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

-----. 2009. Dispensable and bare lives: Coloniality and the hidden political/economic agenda of modernity. Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self-Knowledge 7(2): 68-87.

-----. 2011(b). Epistemic disobedience and the decolonial option: A manifesto. Transmodernity: Journal of Peripheral Cultural Production of the Luso-Hispanic World 1(2): 44-66.

-----. 2000. Local histories/global designs: Essays on the coloniality of power, subaltern knowledges and border thinking. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

-----. 2016. Yes, we can: Non-European thinkers and philosophers. The Aljazeera, February 19, 2013. http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2013/02/20132672747320891.html (Accessed on December 21, 2016)

Pasha, Mustapha. 2011. Untimely reflections. In International relations and non-western thought: Imperialism, colonialism and investigations of global modernity, eds. Robbie Shilliam. London: Routledge.

Quijano, Anibal. 2000. Coloniality of power, ethnocentrism, and Latin America. Nepantla 1(3): 533-580.

Ramón Grosfoguel."Decolonizing the university". 2nd decolonial days, berlin 2011, YouTube video, 30.39, posted by decolonialgroup’s channel, February 20, 2012, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LKgL92yqygk.

Said, Edward. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books.

Sousa Santos, Boaventura. 2014. Epistemologies of the south: Justice against epistemicide. London: Routledge.

Spivak, Gayatri. 1988. Can the subaltern speak?.In Marxism and the interpretation of culture, eds. Cary Nelson and Lawrence Grossberg. New York: Macmillan.

Zabala, Santiago. 2016. Slavoj Žižek and the role of the philosopher. The Aljazeera, December 25, 2012. http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2012/12/20121224122215406939.html. (Accessed on December 21, 2016)

Žižek, Slavoj.2016. A reply to my critics. ThePhilosophical salon, August 5, 2016. http://thephilosophicalsalon.com/a-reply-to-my-critics. (Accessed on December 21, 2016)

-----. 2008. Violence: Six sideways reflections. New York: Picador Books.

Downloads

Published

21-09-2022

How to Cite

Supachalasai, Chyatat. 2022. “Decolonial Epistemology and the Future of Thai IR Theory”. Chulalongkorn University Journal of Social Sciences 47 (1). Bangkok, Thailand:37-62. https://doi.org/10.61462/cujss.v47i1.779.

Issue

Section

Research Articles